| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 766.04 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Será de admitir a ressarcibilidade do dano económico puro - também conhecida como pure
economic loss, figura oriunda da jurisprudência dos países de common law -, à luz das conceções
dogmáticas históricas e contemporâneas da teoria da responsabilidade civil, do direito positivo
estrangeiro e nacional e da prática jurisprudencial portuguesa? Se não, porque razão(ões)? Se sim,
com que fundamento(s)? Será uma análise teórico-prática a satisfazer estas questões, mediante a
concretização constante por intermédio de uma tríade de Casos Ilustrativos. Nestes termos,
propomo-nos a encetar uma exegese positiva e um raciocínio fundado sobre a dogmática civilista
que nos levará, desejavelmente, a reponderar o estado atual da ressarcibilidade do dano
económico puro no seio do ordenamento jurídico nacional.
Is it possible to admit the compensation of pure economic losses - also known as pure financial losses, a figure arising from the case-law of common law jurisdictions - in the light of historical and contemporary dogmatic conceptions of the theory of civil liability, foreign and national positive law and Portuguese jurisdictional practice regarding actions for damages? If not, why not? If yes, on what grounds(s)? By means of a theoretical-practical analysis and through the concretization through a dyad of Illustrative Cases, the abovementioned questions shall be answered. In these terms, we propose to initiate a positive exegesis and a grounded reasoning on the civilist dogmatics that will lead us, eventually, to reconsider the current status of recovery of pure economic losses within the national legal system.
Is it possible to admit the compensation of pure economic losses - also known as pure financial losses, a figure arising from the case-law of common law jurisdictions - in the light of historical and contemporary dogmatic conceptions of the theory of civil liability, foreign and national positive law and Portuguese jurisdictional practice regarding actions for damages? If not, why not? If yes, on what grounds(s)? By means of a theoretical-practical analysis and through the concretization through a dyad of Illustrative Cases, the abovementioned questions shall be answered. In these terms, we propose to initiate a positive exegesis and a grounded reasoning on the civilist dogmatics that will lead us, eventually, to reconsider the current status of recovery of pure economic losses within the national legal system.
Description
Keywords
Dano económico puro Dano puramente económico Dano puramente patrimonial Dano patrimonial primário Indemnização Método do caso Common law Civil law Responsabilidade civil Fontes de responsabilidade civil Artigo 483.º, n.º 1 do Código Civil Cláusula geral Ilicitude Liberdade Foresseability Floodgate argument Segurança jurídica Direitos subjetivos Pressupostos Lacunas jurídicas Helmut Koziol “10 mandamentos” Pure economic losses Pure economic damages Pure financial loss Compensation Case-by-case approach Civil liability Civil liability sources/provisions Article 483(1) of the Civil Code General clause Unlawfulness Preconditions Juridical loopholes “10 commandments”