| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 588.3 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
A presente dissertação visa analisar criticamente o atual regime do período experimental que, com a entrada em vigor da Lei n.º 13/2023, sofreu um conjunto de alterações significativas. Para o efeito, revelou-se necessário o estudo da finalidade do período experimental, bem como a análise das novidades introduzidas pela Lei n.º 93/2019 que, em conjunto com o Acórdão n.º 318/2021 do Tribunal Constitucional, influenciaram a redação da agenda do trabalho digno. Mais ainda, tornou-se essencial a procura por soluções capazes de ultrapassar as dúvidas interpretativas que o atual regime levanta. Neste contexto, demonstrar-se-á que o legislador criou um regime pouco claro e que, por esse motivo, a figura do período experimental continua a merecer um olhar atento e crítico.
This dissertation aims to critically analyze the current trial period regime which, with the entry into force of Law No. 13/2023, has undergone significant changes. To this end, it was necessary to study the purpose of the trial period, as well as the analysis of the new features introduced by Law No. 93/2019 which, together with Ruling No. 318/2021 of the Constitutional Court, influenced the drafting of the decent work agenda. Furthermore, the search for solutions capable of overcoming the interpretative doubts that the current regime raises has become essential. In this context, it will be demonstrated that the legislator created an unclear regime and that, for this reason, the figure of the experimental period continues to deserve a careful and critical look.
This dissertation aims to critically analyze the current trial period regime which, with the entry into force of Law No. 13/2023, has undergone significant changes. To this end, it was necessary to study the purpose of the trial period, as well as the analysis of the new features introduced by Law No. 93/2019 which, together with Ruling No. 318/2021 of the Constitutional Court, influenced the drafting of the decent work agenda. Furthermore, the search for solutions capable of overcoming the interpretative doubts that the current regime raises has become essential. In this context, it will be demonstrated that the legislator created an unclear regime and that, for this reason, the figure of the experimental period continues to deserve a careful and critical look.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Período experimental Lei n.º 93/2019 Agenda do trabalho digno Tribunal Constitucional Trabalhador à procura de primeiro emprego Desempregado de longa duração Estágio profissional Dever de informação Cuidador informal Law no. 93/2019 Decent work agenda Constitutional court First-time jobseekers Long-term unemployed Professional internship Duty of information Informal caregiver