| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 521.4 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Este estudo investigou os perfis de liderança, motivação e satisfação no trabalho de treinadores de futebol de formação, considerando o contexto contingente em que atuam. Inicialmente, foram identificados os diferentes perfis de liderança percebidos pelos treinadores de futebol de formação (objetivo 1). Em seguida, realizou-se uma caracterização sociodemográfica dos perfis encontrados (objetivo 2). Por último, verificou-se se havia diferenças significativas na motivação e satisfação no trabalho dos treinadores, de acordo com o perfil de liderança adotado (objetivo 3). A amostragem foi não probabilística por conveniência contando com a participação de 322 treinadores de futebol de formação. A análise de clusters (K-means) revelou a existência de três perfis de liderança distintos: Perfil Ótimo (n = 117), Perfil Subótimo (n = 162) e Perfil Laissez-faire (n = 31). Os treinadores nos três perfis apresentaram características semelhantes: a maioria, era do sexo masculino, com ensino superior, formação de treinador UEFA C e trabalhavam sem contrato, com compensação financeira informal. Os resultados mostraram que não existem diferenças estatisticamente significativas na motivação e satisfação laboral dos treinadores de acordo com o seu perfil de liderança, exceto na amotivação, onde se percebeu que um treinador com perfil laissez-faire perceciona níveis mais elevados de amotivação.
This study investigated the leadership profiles, motivation, and job satisfaction of youth soccer coaches, considering the contingent work context in which they operate. Initially, the different leadership profiles perceived by the youth soccer coaches were identified (Objective 1). Subsequently, a socio-demographic characterization of the identified profiles was conducted (Objective 2). Finally, it was examined whether there were significant differences in the motivation and job satisfaction of coaches based on their adopted leadership profile (Objective 3). The sampling process employed a non-probabilistic convenience sampling method, with a sample size of 322 youth soccer coaches. Cluster analysis (K-means) revealed the existence of three distinct leadership profiles: Optimal Profile (n = 117), Suboptimal Profile (n = 162), and Laissez-faire Profile (n = 31). Coaches in all three profiles exhibited similar characteristics: predominantly male, possessing a higher education degree, holding a UEFA C coaching certification, and working without a formal contract but receiving informal financial compensation. The results indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in the motivation and job satisfaction of coaches based on their leadership profile, except for amotivation, where coaches with a laissez-faire profile perceived higher levels of amotivation.
This study investigated the leadership profiles, motivation, and job satisfaction of youth soccer coaches, considering the contingent work context in which they operate. Initially, the different leadership profiles perceived by the youth soccer coaches were identified (Objective 1). Subsequently, a socio-demographic characterization of the identified profiles was conducted (Objective 2). Finally, it was examined whether there were significant differences in the motivation and job satisfaction of coaches based on their adopted leadership profile (Objective 3). The sampling process employed a non-probabilistic convenience sampling method, with a sample size of 322 youth soccer coaches. Cluster analysis (K-means) revealed the existence of three distinct leadership profiles: Optimal Profile (n = 117), Suboptimal Profile (n = 162), and Laissez-faire Profile (n = 31). Coaches in all three profiles exhibited similar characteristics: predominantly male, possessing a higher education degree, holding a UEFA C coaching certification, and working without a formal contract but receiving informal financial compensation. The results indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in the motivation and job satisfaction of coaches based on their leadership profile, except for amotivation, where coaches with a laissez-faire profile perceived higher levels of amotivation.
Description
Keywords
Liderança Trabalhadores contingentes Estudo exploratório Treinadores de formação Leadership Contingent workers Exploratory study Training coaches