Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Policy brief on accounting choice and comparability: evidence from fair value option in U.S. banks

dc.contributor.authorFontes, Joana C.
dc.contributor.authorPanaretou, Argyro
dc.contributor.authorShakespeare, Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-27T12:00:34Z
dc.date.available2026-01-27T12:00:34Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-01
dc.description.abstractThe choice between historical cost (HC) and fair value (FV) measurement is highly debated among standard-setters, academics, and practitioners. Stakeholders disagree on whether accounting measurement choices improve or undermine comparability—the extent to which similar (different) economic events are reflected in similar (different) accounting numbers — enabling meaningful comparison across firms and time. The fair value option (FVO) allows entities to apply FV to most financial assets and liabilities, that would otherwise be measured at HC. Critics argued this discretion could reduce comparability by allowing different treatments for identical assets or liabilities.eng
dc.identifier.citationFontes, J. C., Panaretou, A., & Shakespeare, C. (2025, Dec). Policy Brief on Accounting choice and comparability: Evidence from fair value option in U.S. banks. Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
dc.identifier.other2da5fbdd-762b-41e6-a580-495b7add9868
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/56764
dc.language.isoeng
dc.peerreviewedno
dc.publisherUniversidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.titlePolicy brief on accounting choice and comparability: evidence from fair value option in U.S. bankseng
dc.typeOther
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
A carregar...
Miniatura
Nome:
138864457.pdf
Tamanho:
725.38 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format