| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 577.51 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Este trabalho final de mestrado tem como objetivo avaliar o projeto IN_Ruas,
que intervém no âmbito da redução de riscos e minimização de danos (RRMD) junto de
pessoas com consumos problemáticos de drogas no centro histórico de Guimarães.
A partir da Metodologia de Análise de Implementação de Mendes (2006)
pretende-se analisar eventuais falhas no projeto que podem ser explicadas por três tipos
de restrições: restrições de viabilidade, de racionalidade individual e de compatibilidade
de incentivos.
Com a recolha de dados através das entrevistas à equipa técnica, à supervisora e
aos beneficiários e da observação nas idas para o terreno com a equipa, foi possível
concluir que existiam falhas no projeto, nomeadamente a nível do orçamento, visões
diferentes entre a equipa de rua e as entidades parceiras e a resistência dos utentes.
This Final Master Assessement aims to evaluate the project IN_Ruas , which operates under the Reduction of Risks and Harm (RRMD) to individuals with problematical drug addiction in the historical center of Guimarães. Using Mendes’ Implementation Analysis Methodology (2006) we identify possible flaws in the design of the project and discuss the constraints that may be causing them: feasibility constraints, individual rationality and incentive compatibility. We collected data through interviews with the technical team, the supervisors of the project and the beneficiaries and also through direct observation during field visits with the project’s team. We concluded that there are shortcomings in the project, particularly in terms of the budget, different views of the street team and partner organizations and resistance of users.
This Final Master Assessement aims to evaluate the project IN_Ruas , which operates under the Reduction of Risks and Harm (RRMD) to individuals with problematical drug addiction in the historical center of Guimarães. Using Mendes’ Implementation Analysis Methodology (2006) we identify possible flaws in the design of the project and discuss the constraints that may be causing them: feasibility constraints, individual rationality and incentive compatibility. We collected data through interviews with the technical team, the supervisors of the project and the beneficiaries and also through direct observation during field visits with the project’s team. We concluded that there are shortcomings in the project, particularly in terms of the budget, different views of the street team and partner organizations and resistance of users.
Description
Keywords
Projeto IN_Ruas Redução de riscos e minimização de danos Análise de implementação IN_Ruas Project Reduction of risk and damage Implementation analysis