| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1005.37 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
A presente dissertação versa sobre a querela doutrinal, e jurisprudencial, em volta da questão de qual o tratamento e alcance de uma ação de impugnação pauliana julgada procedente, no contexto em que o devedor está numa situação de insolvência (ou é, entretanto, declarado insolvente), problematizando-se a compatibilização do regime de Direito da Insolvência, que conflitua, nesta circunstância, com o Direito das Obrigações. Não obstante a parca literatura em sede de garantias, impõe-se um estudo intensivo da impugnação pauliana, como meio de conservação da garantia patrimonial, e ainda, dos princípios de Direito Insolvencial, que se depreendem do Código da Insolvência e de Recuperação das Empresas, para uma correta conciliação destes dois institutos jurídicos. Assim, tendo em conta a disparidade de soluções, com vista à que melhor salvaguarde o interesse de um determinado credor e, ao mesmo tempo, consagre mecanismos de proteção da universalidade de credores, decorrente de uma declaração de insolvência, chegar-se-á a um resultado inevitável: a resposta nunca será absoluta, ou tão pouco definitiva, em face das circunstâncias factuais e históricas, e da constante evolução do Direito.
This dissertation focuses on the doctrinal and jurisprudential quarrel, around the treatment and extent of an actio pauliana upheld. The context of the aforementioned dissertation regards the case in which the debtor is in a situation of insolvency (or becomes insolvent), analysing the compatibility of the Insolvency Law regime, which conflicts, in this circumstance, with the Law of Obligations. Due to the lack of literature on guarantees, an intensive study of the institute of actio pauliana is required, in furtherance of preserving the asset guarantee, and also, the principles of Insolvency Law, which are de duced from Insolvency and Corporate Recovery Law, for an adequate conciliation of these two legal institutes Thus, in the light of the disparity of solutions, pursuing the one that most accurately guarantees the interest of a certain creditor and, at the same time, enshrines mechanisms for the protection of the universality of creditors (resulting from a declaration of insolvency), an inevitable result will eventually take place - the answer will never be either absolute or definitive, considering not only the factual and historical circumstances, but also the constant evolution of the Law.
This dissertation focuses on the doctrinal and jurisprudential quarrel, around the treatment and extent of an actio pauliana upheld. The context of the aforementioned dissertation regards the case in which the debtor is in a situation of insolvency (or becomes insolvent), analysing the compatibility of the Insolvency Law regime, which conflicts, in this circumstance, with the Law of Obligations. Due to the lack of literature on guarantees, an intensive study of the institute of actio pauliana is required, in furtherance of preserving the asset guarantee, and also, the principles of Insolvency Law, which are de duced from Insolvency and Corporate Recovery Law, for an adequate conciliation of these two legal institutes Thus, in the light of the disparity of solutions, pursuing the one that most accurately guarantees the interest of a certain creditor and, at the same time, enshrines mechanisms for the protection of the universality of creditors (resulting from a declaration of insolvency), an inevitable result will eventually take place - the answer will never be either absolute or definitive, considering not only the factual and historical circumstances, but also the constant evolution of the Law.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Responsabilidade patrimonial Impugnação pauliana Declaração de insolvência Princípio par conditio creditorum Patrimonial responsibility Actio pauliana Declaration of insolvency Par conditio creditorum principle