| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 483.63 KB | Adobe PDF |
Abstract(s)
Introdução: Nos dias que correm, perante uma situação em que seja necessário um tratamento endodôntico, recorremos à endodontia clássica, que atua na remoção da polpa dentária, com limas dentárias e substituição da mesma por guta-percha e cimento endodôntico, ficando estes materiais no interior dos canais dentários. No entanto, com a endodontia regenerativa, vamos avaliar a possibilidade de existir um tratamento alternativo à endodontia clássica, de forma a utilizar proteínas e outro tipo de moléculas que podem ajudar a fomentar o crescimento de novas células, através de scaffolds dentários. Materiais e métodos: A presente revisão sistemática seguiu a questão principal PICO, com critérios de inclusão e critérios de exclusão, fundamentando-se nas guidelines PRISMA. Foram utilizadas plataformas de pesquisa de artigos, como a PubMed e a ScienceDirect, assim como foi utilizado um processo de triagem para determinar os artigos finais a serem utilizados. Resultados: Após a seleção final, foram analisados 6 artigos para análise detalhada que referenciavam alguns scaffolds na ação dos mesmos, em relação a grupos controlo ou grupos com diferentes scaffolds entre si. De uma forma geral, foram obtidos bons valores a nível de resolução sintomática dos pacientes, assim como no comprimento das raízes e também na grossura das paredes dentinárias das raízes. Conclusão: Apesar dos valores positivos obtidos nestes estudos, estatisticamente as diferenças entre os valores obtidos nos grupos controlo e experimentais não foram suficientes para definirem a vantagem da utilização dos scaffolds.
Introduction: Nowadays, when we have a situation that needs an endodontic treatment, we use the classic endodontic approach, removing the dental pulp, using dental files and replacing the dental pulp with cones of guta-percha and endodontic sealers. However, trough the regenerative endodontics, we’re going to evaluate the possibility of a different approachs instead of the normal use of the classic endodontics, using proteins and other source of molecules that can try to create the formation of new cells, and suddenly new dental pulp, through dental scaffolds. Materials and Methods: The present systematic revision followed the main question PICO, with inclusion and exclusion criteria, grounding itself in the PRISMA guidelines. There were used search platforms, like PubMed and ScienceDirect and it was done a screening process to choose the final articles on use. Results: After the final selection, 6 articles that compared the direct action of scaffolds, in between control groups and experimental groups or different scaffolds in different groups were choosen to further and deeper analysis. In general, good results were obtain in resolving symptoms, as in the the rooth length and in the rooth wall thickness. Conclusion: Despite the results being positive in these studies, statistically the differences obtained in the control and experimental groups were not enough to establish the advantages of the scaffolds.
Introduction: Nowadays, when we have a situation that needs an endodontic treatment, we use the classic endodontic approach, removing the dental pulp, using dental files and replacing the dental pulp with cones of guta-percha and endodontic sealers. However, trough the regenerative endodontics, we’re going to evaluate the possibility of a different approachs instead of the normal use of the classic endodontics, using proteins and other source of molecules that can try to create the formation of new cells, and suddenly new dental pulp, through dental scaffolds. Materials and Methods: The present systematic revision followed the main question PICO, with inclusion and exclusion criteria, grounding itself in the PRISMA guidelines. There were used search platforms, like PubMed and ScienceDirect and it was done a screening process to choose the final articles on use. Results: After the final selection, 6 articles that compared the direct action of scaffolds, in between control groups and experimental groups or different scaffolds in different groups were choosen to further and deeper analysis. In general, good results were obtain in resolving symptoms, as in the the rooth length and in the rooth wall thickness. Conclusion: Despite the results being positive in these studies, statistically the differences obtained in the control and experimental groups were not enough to establish the advantages of the scaffolds.
Description
Keywords
Endodontia Scaffolds 3D Engenharia de tecidos Complexo dentino-pulpar Endodontics 3D Scaffolds Tissue engineering Pulp-dentine complex