| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.55 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Competeàsociedade proteger as crianças e os jovens, norteando a nossaintervenção,tendo em conta o seu superior interesse, abordandoadequadamente as causas subjacentes a todas formasde maus-tratos, negligência e abusos. Identificar os indicadores de perigo dos cuidadores implica trabalharno sentido da promoção dos direitose proteção das crianças.A metodologia proposta para este estudonorteia-se pelo marco da pesquisa qualitativa, consistindo na construção de um instrumento de avaliaçãoque caracteriza em várias dimensões os cuidadoresreferenciadosàsComissõesde Proteção Crianças e Jovens, contribuindo para a identificação das suas fragilidades.A investigaçãoefetuada organiza-se em três estudosque,no seu conjunto, procuram dar resposta a trêsquestões centrais:quais sãoos indicadores de perigo dos cuidadores e osinstrumentos de avaliação que emergem da realização de uma scoping review?; que indicadores de perigo dos cuidadores se encontram registados nos processos das crianças e jovens referenciados à Comissão de Proteção de Crianças e Jovens?;qual é a opiniãodos peritos na área em relação à pertinência e clareza dos mesmos?Neste estudo estruturam-se quatro níveis de atividade e três questões de investigação quecorrespondem às diferentes etapas da construção dos indicadores de perigo dos cuidadores.O primeiroconsistiu na realização de umarevisão scopingque permitiu mapear a literatura.Como resultado identificamos 36indicadores de perigo de cuidadores de crianças e jovens referenciados aos serviços de proteção à infância.Com os resultados do estudo anterior construímos o suporte teórico para o segundo estudo de natureza exploratória e analítica, que consistiu na consulta de 20processos da Comissão de Proteção de Crianças e Jovens, que foram alvo de uma análise detalhada onde constatámos o que se avalia nosprocessos das crianças e jovens referenciados, e que indicadores de perigo dos cuidadores se encontram espelhados nos mesmos.Os 43indicadores de perigo dos cuidadores que resultaram dos dois estudos anteriores permitiram a construção do instrumento. O mesmo foi validado por peritos
quanto à pertinência e clareza de cada um dos indicadores através da realização de um focusgrupo.Na realização do focusgrupo, cujos resultados estão espelhados no terceiroestudo,nenhum dosindicadores foi retirado, porser consensual a todos os peritos, a suapertinência.Foi efetuada uma reorganização dos mesmos, que resultou em 40 indicadores, sugerindo-separa todos um glossário de termos tornando mais claro e preciso o que se pretende avaliar com cada um.Oinstrumento de avaliação dos cuidadores, que intitulamos de instrumento de avaliação de perigo dos cuidadores das crianças e jovens referenciados à Comissão de Proteção de Crianças e Jovens, épor quatro dimensões:os padrões de interação social e económicos; onde constam 5 indicadores; as características da Família constituída por 14 indicadores; as características dos cuidadores na qual englobamos 12 indicadores, e o exercício da parentalidade que conta com 9 indicadores. Como conclusão importa referir que ao longo de todo o processo ficou marcada a necessidade de um instrumento de fácil preenchimento que aglutinasse com objetividade o que avaliar nos cuidadores garantindo o superior interesse da criança, sendo necessário agora passar à fase seguinte que consta da determinação das caraterísticas psicométricas.
It is our responsibility as a society to protectchildren and young people, guiding our intervention, minding their superior interests, dealingadequately with the subjacent causes to all forms of mistreatment, neglect and abuse. To identifythe risk indicatorsof the caregivers implies to work in the promotion of children’s rights and protection. The proposed methodology for this study is guided by the standard of qualitative research, consisting in the construction of anassement tool that caracterizes in several dimentionsthe caregivers referenced to the Child and Youth ProtectionBoards, contributing to identify their frailties.The investigation is organized inthree studiesthatseek to give an answer to threemain questions: what are the risk indicators of the caregivers and the assessment tools that emerge from the executionof a scoping review?; what risk indicators are registered in theChild andYouth Protection Boardsfiles?and what are the experts opinions regarding these indicators? In this study there are fourlevels of activity and three investigation questions that correspond to the differentconstructionstages of the caregivers risk indicators. The first one consisted in ascoping review that allowed maping the literature. As a result, we identified 36 risk indicators of the referenced children and youth caregivers.With the results of the previous study we built the theoreticalsupportfor the second study. That consisted in the detailed analysisof 20 Child and Youth Protection Board(CPCJ)processes, where we found what are assessedin the processes and what their risk indicators are.The 43risk indictors that resulted from the 2 previous studies allowed the construction of the tool. Which was validated by experts regarding the pertinence and clarity ofeach one the indicators trough the realization of a focus group.In the realization of the focus group, whose results are mirrored in the third study, none of the indicators were removed, as their relevance was agreed upon by all experts. They were reorganized, resulting in 40 indicators, suggesting a glossary of terms for everyone, making it clearer and more precise what they intend to evaluate with each one.The caregiverassessment tool, which we call the riskassessment tool of caregivers of children and young people referred to the CPCJ, has four dimensions: the patterns of social and economic interaction; where there are 5 indicators; the characteristics of the family consisting of 14 indicators; the characteristics of caregivers in which we include 12 indicators, and the exercise of parenting that has 9 indicators.As a conclusion is important to mention that throughout the whole processit was made clear the necessityof an instrument/tool of easy filling which objectively aggregates what to evaluate in the caregivers, guarantying the superior interest of the children. Being now necessary to pass to the next step which is the determination of the psychometric characteristics
It is our responsibility as a society to protectchildren and young people, guiding our intervention, minding their superior interests, dealingadequately with the subjacent causes to all forms of mistreatment, neglect and abuse. To identifythe risk indicatorsof the caregivers implies to work in the promotion of children’s rights and protection. The proposed methodology for this study is guided by the standard of qualitative research, consisting in the construction of anassement tool that caracterizes in several dimentionsthe caregivers referenced to the Child and Youth ProtectionBoards, contributing to identify their frailties.The investigation is organized inthree studiesthatseek to give an answer to threemain questions: what are the risk indicators of the caregivers and the assessment tools that emerge from the executionof a scoping review?; what risk indicators are registered in theChild andYouth Protection Boardsfiles?and what are the experts opinions regarding these indicators? In this study there are fourlevels of activity and three investigation questions that correspond to the differentconstructionstages of the caregivers risk indicators. The first one consisted in ascoping review that allowed maping the literature. As a result, we identified 36 risk indicators of the referenced children and youth caregivers.With the results of the previous study we built the theoreticalsupportfor the second study. That consisted in the detailed analysisof 20 Child and Youth Protection Board(CPCJ)processes, where we found what are assessedin the processes and what their risk indicators are.The 43risk indictors that resulted from the 2 previous studies allowed the construction of the tool. Which was validated by experts regarding the pertinence and clarity ofeach one the indicators trough the realization of a focus group.In the realization of the focus group, whose results are mirrored in the third study, none of the indicators were removed, as their relevance was agreed upon by all experts. They were reorganized, resulting in 40 indicators, suggesting a glossary of terms for everyone, making it clearer and more precise what they intend to evaluate with each one.The caregiverassessment tool, which we call the riskassessment tool of caregivers of children and young people referred to the CPCJ, has four dimensions: the patterns of social and economic interaction; where there are 5 indicators; the characteristics of the family consisting of 14 indicators; the characteristics of caregivers in which we include 12 indicators, and the exercise of parenting that has 9 indicators.As a conclusion is important to mention that throughout the whole processit was made clear the necessityof an instrument/tool of easy filling which objectively aggregates what to evaluate in the caregivers, guarantying the superior interest of the children. Being now necessary to pass to the next step which is the determination of the psychometric characteristics
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Cuidadores Serviços de proteção Indicadores de perigo Crianças Jovens Instrumentos de avaliação Caregiver Protection service Child Young Assessment Evalution tool