Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.01 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Se expone la interpretación de Franz Hinkelammert y las posiciones afines a dicha interpretación entre la comunidad de investigadores especialistas en el pensamiento de David Hume.
La investigación consta de dos partes. En la primera se expone la interpretación que Franz Hinkelammert hace sobre A Treatise of Human Nature de David Hume. En la segunda se busca mostrar la correspondencia entre dicha interpretación y las posiciones o interpretaciones propias de la comunidad de especialistas en el pensamiento de David Hume en torno a dos ejes argumentativos: el principio de causalidad y el principio de justicia.
De ese modo se compara la correspondencia entre ambas interpretaciones para evaluar hasta qué punto es factible sostener la interpretación que Franz Hinkelammert hace sobre el método de pensamiento de David Hume como válido.
The research exposes the interpretation of Franz Hinkelammert and the positions related to this interpretation among the community of scholars specializing in the thought of David Hume. The investigation consists of two parts. In the first one is exposed the interpretation that Franz Hinkelammert makes about A Treatise of Human Nature by David Hume. In the second one, it seeks to show the correspondence between this interpretation and the positions or interpretations proper to the community of specialists in the thought of David Hume around two axes: the principle of causality and the principle of justice. In this way the correspondence between the two interpretations is compared to evaluate to what extent it is feasible to support Franz Hinkelammert's interpretation of David Hume's method of thought as valid.
The research exposes the interpretation of Franz Hinkelammert and the positions related to this interpretation among the community of scholars specializing in the thought of David Hume. The investigation consists of two parts. In the first one is exposed the interpretation that Franz Hinkelammert makes about A Treatise of Human Nature by David Hume. In the second one, it seeks to show the correspondence between this interpretation and the positions or interpretations proper to the community of specialists in the thought of David Hume around two axes: the principle of causality and the principle of justice. In this way the correspondence between the two interpretations is compared to evaluate to what extent it is feasible to support Franz Hinkelammert's interpretation of David Hume's method of thought as valid.