| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 862.88 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A eutanásia continua a dividir opiniões, não sendo nada consensual. Uns priorizam o direito de dispor da vida, outros consideram-na contra os valores da comunidade, cabendo a decisão à mãe natureza. Procuramos questionar os limites do ser humano em relação à sua própria vida. Saber se há possibilidade dessa abertura na nossa ordem jurídica. Se esta prática é possível de ser aceite segundo o exposto na nossa Lei fundamental. Não se pretende que os que são contra ela se tornem a favor, mas no mínimo questionar essa hipótese. Devemos partir do ponto zero, sem qualquer influência cultural, política, ética e moral. Pode não ser uma opção para nós, mas podemos reconsiderar que pode ser para outros. Está em causa conceder uma opção e não impor uma obrigação.
Euthanasia continues to divide opinions, not being consensual. Some prioritize the right to dispose of life, others consider it against the values of the community, leaving the decision to mother nature. We seek to question the limits of the human being in relation to his own life. To know if there is a possibility of this opening in our legal system. Whether this practice is possible to be accepted according to the provisions of our Fundamental Law. It is not intended that those who are against it become in favor, but at least to question this hypothesis. We must start from zero, without any cultural, political, ethical and moral influence. It might not be an option for us, but we can reconsider that it might be for others. It is about granting an option and not imposing an obligation.
Euthanasia continues to divide opinions, not being consensual. Some prioritize the right to dispose of life, others consider it against the values of the community, leaving the decision to mother nature. We seek to question the limits of the human being in relation to his own life. To know if there is a possibility of this opening in our legal system. Whether this practice is possible to be accepted according to the provisions of our Fundamental Law. It is not intended that those who are against it become in favor, but at least to question this hypothesis. We must start from zero, without any cultural, political, ethical and moral influence. It might not be an option for us, but we can reconsider that it might be for others. It is about granting an option and not imposing an obligation.
Description
Keywords
Eutanásia Morte Vida Pedido Sofrimento Dor Abertura Punível Direito Ética Moral Sociedade Autodeterminação Euthanasia Death Life Request Suffering Pain Opening Punishable Right Ethic Moral Society Self-determination