| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 589.99 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Abstract(s)
Com a presente investigação focamos as nossas atenções no regime aplicável ao contrato
de arrendamento quer quando o insolvente é o senhorio quer quando o insolvente é o
arrendatário. Propusemo-nos a investigar a aprofundar as disposições legais que sobre
esta matéria existem, a estudar a natureza do direito do arrendatário e manutenção ou não
do contrato de arrendamento com a venda em processo de insolvência.
Através deste estudo vemos que o arrendatário tem direito de preferência na venda do
imóvel que ocorra no processo de insolvência e que, embora não seja unânime, o seu
direito no arrendamento assume a natureza direito de pessoal de gozo.
Concluímos que existe divergência nas várias decisões judiciais no que à caducidade do
contrato de arrendamento com a venda judicial diz respeito, porque a lei não regula
completamente essa questão. Mas cremos que o contrato de arrendamento deve caducar
com a venda em processo de insolvência do imóvel, encerrando o Acórdão de
Uniformização de Jurisprudência que analisamos uma solução que não é a materialmente
mais correta, postergando os interesses dos credores hipotecários.
With this research we focus our attention on the regime applicable to the lease agreement both when the insolvent is the landlord and when the insolvent is the tenant. We have proposed to investigate and deepen the legal provisions that exist on this matter, to study the nature of the tenant's right and the maintenance or not of the lease agreement with the sale in insolvency proceedings. Through this study we see that the tenant has the right of preference in the sale of the property that occurs in the insolvency proceeding and that, although it is not unanimous, his right in the lease assumes the nature of personal right of enjoyment. We conclude that there is divergence in the several judicial decisions regarding the expiration of the lease agreement with the judicial sale, because the law does not completely regulate this issue. However, we believe that the lease should expire upon the sale of the property in insolvency proceedings. The Uniform Jurisprudence Judgment we are analyzing is not the most materially correct solution, ignoring the mortgage creditors' interests.
With this research we focus our attention on the regime applicable to the lease agreement both when the insolvent is the landlord and when the insolvent is the tenant. We have proposed to investigate and deepen the legal provisions that exist on this matter, to study the nature of the tenant's right and the maintenance or not of the lease agreement with the sale in insolvency proceedings. Through this study we see that the tenant has the right of preference in the sale of the property that occurs in the insolvency proceeding and that, although it is not unanimous, his right in the lease assumes the nature of personal right of enjoyment. We conclude that there is divergence in the several judicial decisions regarding the expiration of the lease agreement with the judicial sale, because the law does not completely regulate this issue. However, we believe that the lease should expire upon the sale of the property in insolvency proceedings. The Uniform Jurisprudence Judgment we are analyzing is not the most materially correct solution, ignoring the mortgage creditors' interests.
Description
Keywords
Insolvência Arrendatário Senhorio Hipoteca caducidade Preferência Bankruptcy Tenant Landlord Mortgage Expiration Preference