| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.12 MB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O presente estudo centra-se na análise do Comprehensive Approach, na NATO e na UE,
na gestão de crises, e sustenta o argumento de que as duas organizações possuem
orientações divergentes e convergentes. Partindo do desidrato primário, a consolidação
do planeamento e do modo de atuação, o CA foi revigorado e redenominado pelas OI’s,
como consequência da expansão de tarefas, tempos e atores, e da interação entre estes.
Neste sentido, o argumento foi construído através do estudo da evolução institucional
do CA, dos atores, do processo de gestão de crises, das capacidades, da cooperação
interna e externa e dos estudos de caso, no Afeganistão e no Corno de África, na NATO
e na UE, respectivamente. Deste estudo, percepciona-se a intenção da Aliança em
contribuir, como parte integrante da comunidade internacional para o CA, e que a União
está interessada em empreendê-lo, através dos múltiplos instrumentos de que dispõe. A
simultânea persecução da Grand Strategy, o WGA como método de atuação e a
constante busca de inspiração, por parte da UE à NATO, nas questões de planeamento
militar, torna-as operacionalmente semelhantes. Os três pontos de encontro elencados
confluem numa possível lógica de cooperação, a longo prazo, e numa ideia de
convergência, para uma futura gestão de crise.
This study focuses on the analysis of the Comprehensive Approach, in NATO and the EU, in crisis management, and supports the argument that the two organizations have different and convergent guidelines. Starting from the primary purpose, the consolidation of planning and operationalization, the CA was refreshed and renamed by IO's, as a result of expansion of tasks, time and actors, and the interaction between them. In this sense, the argument was built by studying the institutional evolution of the CA, the actors, the crisis management process, the capacities, the internal and external cooperation and the case studies of Afghanistan and Horn of Africa, in NATO and in the EU, respectively. In this study, it is perceived the intention of the Alliance to contribute as part of the international community to the CA, and that the Union is interested in undertake it, through the multiple instruments at its disposal. The simultaneous pursuit of Grand Strategy, WGA as operational method and the constant search for inspiration, by the EU to NATO in military planning issues, makes them operationally similar. The three points listed converge into a possible cooperation on the long term, and for a future joint commitment on crisis management.
This study focuses on the analysis of the Comprehensive Approach, in NATO and the EU, in crisis management, and supports the argument that the two organizations have different and convergent guidelines. Starting from the primary purpose, the consolidation of planning and operationalization, the CA was refreshed and renamed by IO's, as a result of expansion of tasks, time and actors, and the interaction between them. In this sense, the argument was built by studying the institutional evolution of the CA, the actors, the crisis management process, the capacities, the internal and external cooperation and the case studies of Afghanistan and Horn of Africa, in NATO and in the EU, respectively. In this study, it is perceived the intention of the Alliance to contribute as part of the international community to the CA, and that the Union is interested in undertake it, through the multiple instruments at its disposal. The simultaneous pursuit of Grand Strategy, WGA as operational method and the constant search for inspiration, by the EU to NATO in military planning issues, makes them operationally similar. The three points listed converge into a possible cooperation on the long term, and for a future joint commitment on crisis management.
Description
Keywords
Comprehensive Approach NATO UE Afeganistão Corno de África WGA CIMIC EU Afghanistan Horn of Africa