Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
16.48 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Abstract(s)
A devolução do património cultural aos países de origem é um tema central nos debates contemporâneos, incluindo o contexto português e as suas ex-colónias. Esta tese insere-se nos estudos pós-coloniais, encontrando nos estudos de proveniência uma forma de abordar a reparação do passado colonial. A investigação combina etnografia e museologia para examinar as dinâmicas entre os objetos culturais recolhidos durante o período colonial na Guiné-Bissau e as instituições que os preservam hoje, tanto em Portugal como no país de origem. Realizado ao longo de quatro anos, o estudo reflete sobre o papel dos museus, do património e da sociedade civil na construção de narrativas alternativas. Analisou-se a história das coleções museológicas, incluindo os contextos em que foram recolhidas, conservadas e exibidas, para compreender os significados atribuídos a estes objetos no presente. Deu-se ênfase à opinião da sociedade civil guineense, incluindo residentes no país e na diáspora. Esta abordagem participativa questiona a narrativa eurocêntrica dominante e coloca no centro da investigação as vozes dos guineenses sobre o valor, o papel e o destino destes bens culturais. A restituição dos objetos, embora importante, não é apresentada como prioridade pela maioria dos guineenses inquiridos. Muitas opiniões convergem na necessidade de criar primeiro infraestruturas adequadas, capacitar recursos humanos e garantir a valorização do património na Guiné-Bissau. Outros ainda destacam a relevância da presença desses objetos em museus europeus como representação da diáspora e da identidade guineense no estrangeiro. Estas perceções refletem uma visão plural e complexa, que vai além de uma simples transferência material de bens, propondo uma restituição que envolva também suporte financeiro e técnico. A investigação expande o debate sobre a devolução de bens culturais ao questionar se esta é suficiente para sanar as feridas do colonialismo. Argumenta que é fundamental atravessar fronteiras físicas e simbólicas, aceitando a pluralidade de vozes e o papel do património como meio de reconciliação e diálogo intercultural. Discute o impacto da cultura, da educação e da globalização na construção da identidade guineense, apontando caminhos para uma gestão do património que seja sustentável e representativa das comunidades locais. Assim, o estudo propõe alternativas baseadas em cooperação e na partilha de responsabilidades, enfatizando a restituição como um gesto político, cultural e educativo.
The return of cultural heritage to the countries of origin is a central theme in contemporary debates, including in the context of Portugal and its former colonies. This thesis is part of postcolonial studies and finds in provenance studies a way of approaching the reparation of the colonial past. The research combines ethnography and museology to examine the dynamics between cultural objects collected during the colonial era in Guinea-Bissau and the institutions that preserve them today, both in Portugal and in their country of origin. Carried out over four years, the study reflects on the role of museums, heritage, and civil society in constructing alternative narratives. To understand the meanings attributed to these objects today, the first part analyzes the history of the museum collections, including the contexts in which they were collected, conserved, and exhibited. The second part focuses on the opinions of Guinean civil society, both residents of the country and members of the diaspora. This participatory approach challenges the dominant Eurocentric narrative. It places the voices of Bissau-Guineans at the center of the investigation into the value, role, and fate of these cultural goods. While important, the restitution of cultural property is not a priority for most Guinean respondents. Many opinions converge on the need for the creation of adequate infrastructures, the training of human resources, and the guarantee of the valorization of the cultural heritage in Guinea-Bissau. Others stress the importance of the presence of these objects in European museums. They represent the Guinean diaspora and identity abroad. These perceptions reflect a plural and complex vision that goes beyond a simple material transfer of cultural goods, proposing restitution as an act of financial and technical support. The research extends the debate on the return of cultural objects by questioning whether it is enough to heal the wounds of colonialism. It argues that embracing the plurality of voices and the role of heritage as a means of reconciliation and intercultural dialogue is essential to transcending physical and symbolic borders. It also suggests ways of managing heritage sustainably and representing local communities. It discusses the impact of culture, education, and globalization on constructing Guinean identity. The study emphasizes restitution as a political, cultural, and educational gesture and proposes alternatives based on cooperation and shared responsibility.
The return of cultural heritage to the countries of origin is a central theme in contemporary debates, including in the context of Portugal and its former colonies. This thesis is part of postcolonial studies and finds in provenance studies a way of approaching the reparation of the colonial past. The research combines ethnography and museology to examine the dynamics between cultural objects collected during the colonial era in Guinea-Bissau and the institutions that preserve them today, both in Portugal and in their country of origin. Carried out over four years, the study reflects on the role of museums, heritage, and civil society in constructing alternative narratives. To understand the meanings attributed to these objects today, the first part analyzes the history of the museum collections, including the contexts in which they were collected, conserved, and exhibited. The second part focuses on the opinions of Guinean civil society, both residents of the country and members of the diaspora. This participatory approach challenges the dominant Eurocentric narrative. It places the voices of Bissau-Guineans at the center of the investigation into the value, role, and fate of these cultural goods. While important, the restitution of cultural property is not a priority for most Guinean respondents. Many opinions converge on the need for the creation of adequate infrastructures, the training of human resources, and the guarantee of the valorization of the cultural heritage in Guinea-Bissau. Others stress the importance of the presence of these objects in European museums. They represent the Guinean diaspora and identity abroad. These perceptions reflect a plural and complex vision that goes beyond a simple material transfer of cultural goods, proposing restitution as an act of financial and technical support. The research extends the debate on the return of cultural objects by questioning whether it is enough to heal the wounds of colonialism. It argues that embracing the plurality of voices and the role of heritage as a means of reconciliation and intercultural dialogue is essential to transcending physical and symbolic borders. It also suggests ways of managing heritage sustainably and representing local communities. It discusses the impact of culture, education, and globalization on constructing Guinean identity. The study emphasizes restitution as a political, cultural, and educational gesture and proposes alternatives based on cooperation and shared responsibility.
Description
Keywords
Restituição Reparação Memória Coleções etnográficas, estudos pós-coloniais Património cultural Guiné-Bissau Restitution Reparation Memory Ethnographic collections, post-colonial studies Guinea-Bissau Cultural heritage
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
CC License
Without CC licence