Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 MB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A presente dissertação parte de uma breve exposição dos institutos da Impugnação Pauliana e da Resolução em Benefício da Massa, com especial incidência nos efeitos decorrentes de cada um deles. Dali, seguimos para um estudo aprofundado acerca da articulação entre o os dois regimes quando intersetados pelo processo de insolvência, debruçando-nos ainda sobre o princípio Par Conditio Creditorum, e a sua eventual violação neste contexto. Com efeito, prosseguimos para o tema central deste trabalho: a análise dos efeitos da ação de impugnação pauliana procedente no processo de insolvência. Assim, verificamos existirem na doutrina e jurisprudência dois entendimentos distintos, atribuindo à impugnação pauliana efeitos pessoais ou efeitos coletivos. Deste modo, indagamos acerca das consequências que de cada posição advêm para os credores da insolvência, servindo nos, para tal, de variados acórdãos que espelham, no plano prático, a (in)justiça das soluções adotadas em cada caso.
This dissertation begins with a brief exposition of the legal institutions of Pauliana action and Clawback in Benefit of the Insolvent Estate, with a particular focus on the effects arising from each of them. From there, we move on to an in-depth study of the interaction between these two regimes when intersected by insolvency proceedings, also examining the Par Conditio Creditorum principle and its potential violation in this context. Indeed, we then proceed to the central theme of this work: the analysis of the effects of a successful Pauliana action in insolvency proceedings. Thus, we observe that legal doctrine and case law present two distinct interpretations, attributing either personal effects or collective effects to the Paulian action. In this regard, we inquire into the consequences that each position entails for insolvency creditors, relying on various court rulings that reflect, in practical terms, the (in)justice of the solutions adopted in each case.
This dissertation begins with a brief exposition of the legal institutions of Pauliana action and Clawback in Benefit of the Insolvent Estate, with a particular focus on the effects arising from each of them. From there, we move on to an in-depth study of the interaction between these two regimes when intersected by insolvency proceedings, also examining the Par Conditio Creditorum principle and its potential violation in this context. Indeed, we then proceed to the central theme of this work: the analysis of the effects of a successful Pauliana action in insolvency proceedings. Thus, we observe that legal doctrine and case law present two distinct interpretations, attributing either personal effects or collective effects to the Paulian action. In this regard, we inquire into the consequences that each position entails for insolvency creditors, relying on various court rulings that reflect, in practical terms, the (in)justice of the solutions adopted in each case.
Description
Keywords
Impugnação pauliana Insolvência Par conditio creditorum Resolução em benefício da massa Administrador de insolvência Pauliana action Insolvency Clawback in benefit of the insolvent estate Insolvency administrator
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
CC License
Without CC licence