| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.97 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A definição de Justiça Restaurativa (JR) tem suscitado um intenso debate até aos dias de hoje e um pouco por todo o mundo. O objetivo principal do presente estudo consiste na exploração e compreensão da definição de Justiça Restaurativa, por vários profissionais que atuam no âmbito do sistema de justiça juvenil em Portugal. Procurou-se aceder às perceções de Magistrados, Técnicos de apoio à vítima e Técnicos que trabalham diretamente com ofensores, acerca da definição de JR. Participaram no estudo 6 Magistrados, 4 Técnicos de apoio à vítima e 8 Técnicos que trabalham com ofensores. Os resultados apontam para 4 tipos de definições que se organizam de diferentes formas: definição por oposição ao modelo de justiça criminal tradicional; definição em função do contexto de atuação; definição em função dos objetivos, processos e resultados e definição em função dos atores dos processos. Para além dos 4 tipos de definições encontradas, verificaram-se diferenças relevantes nas perceções dos participantes em função da categoria profissional que ocupam.
The definition of Restorative Justice (RJ) has sparked an intense debate to this day and around the world. The main objective of the present study is to explore and understand the definition of Restorative Justice by several professionals working within the scope of the juvenile justice system in Portugal. We sought to access the perceptions of Magistrates, Victim Support Officers and Officers working directly with offenders, about the definition of JR. Participants in the study were 6 Magistrates, 4 Victim Support Officers and 8 Officers working with offenders. The results point to 4 types of definitions that are organized in different ways: definition as opposed to the traditional criminal justice model; definition according to the context of action; definition according to the objectives, processes and results and definition according to the actors of the processes. In addition to the four types of definitions found, there were significant differences in the perceptions of the participants according to their professional category.
The definition of Restorative Justice (RJ) has sparked an intense debate to this day and around the world. The main objective of the present study is to explore and understand the definition of Restorative Justice by several professionals working within the scope of the juvenile justice system in Portugal. We sought to access the perceptions of Magistrates, Victim Support Officers and Officers working directly with offenders, about the definition of JR. Participants in the study were 6 Magistrates, 4 Victim Support Officers and 8 Officers working with offenders. The results point to 4 types of definitions that are organized in different ways: definition as opposed to the traditional criminal justice model; definition according to the context of action; definition according to the objectives, processes and results and definition according to the actors of the processes. In addition to the four types of definitions found, there were significant differences in the perceptions of the participants according to their professional category.
Description
Keywords
Justiça restaurativa Definição Magistrados Técnicos Ofensores Vítimas Restorative justice Definition Magistrates Officers Offenders Victims