Loading...
Publication
A compensatio lucri cum damno na responsabilidade civil pré-contratual das entidades adjudicantes
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 667.55 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Perante a ocorrência de um facto lesivo nem sempre advêm apenas desvantagens para o lesado, podendo também suceder que este evento acarrete vantagens. Efetivamente, quando um determinado facto lesivo proporcione determinadas vantagens ao lesado, discute-se se estas vantagens devem ser deduzidas ao quantum indemnizatório a prestar pelo lesante, por força do princípio da compensatio lucri cum damno. Esta discussão, que nasce no foro civilístico, tem vindo, de forma progressiva, a ser colocada no domínio do Direito Administrativo. No entanto, não é evidente que este princípio possa ser aplicado na Responsabilidade Civil Pré-Contratual das Entidades Adjudicantes. Assim, o primeiro momento desta investigação começa por abordar a temática da Responsabilidade Civil Pré-Contratual das Entidades Adjudicantes, o princípio da compensatio lucri cum damno e a respetiva admissibilidade deste princípio no âmbito do Direito Administrativo. O segundo momento desta investigação concerne à admissibilidade deste princípio no âmbito da Responsabilidade Civil Pré-Contratual das Entidades Adjudicantes, com especial foco no caso de preterição ilícita de um concorrente num procedimento de formação de um contrato público e outros casos análogos.
The occurrence of a harmful event does not always only result in disadvantages for the injured party, but it can also bring advantages. In fact, when a certain harmful event brings certain advantages to the injured party, it is debated whether these advantages should be deducted from the quantum of compensation to be paid by the injured party, by virtue of the principle of compensatio lucri cum damno. This discussion, which originated in Civil Law, has gradually been brought into the field of the Administrative Law. However, it is not clear that this principle can be applied to the Pre-Contractual Civil Liability of Contracting Authorities. Therefore, the first part of this research begins by addressing the issue of the Pre-Contractual Civil Liability of Contracting Authorities, the principle of compensatio lucri cum damno and the respective admissibility of this principle in the context of Administrative Law. The second stage of this research concerns the admissibility of this principle in the context of the Pre-Contractual Civil Liability of Contracting Authorities, with a special focus on the case of unlawful rejection of a competitor in a public tender procedure and other similar cases.
The occurrence of a harmful event does not always only result in disadvantages for the injured party, but it can also bring advantages. In fact, when a certain harmful event brings certain advantages to the injured party, it is debated whether these advantages should be deducted from the quantum of compensation to be paid by the injured party, by virtue of the principle of compensatio lucri cum damno. This discussion, which originated in Civil Law, has gradually been brought into the field of the Administrative Law. However, it is not clear that this principle can be applied to the Pre-Contractual Civil Liability of Contracting Authorities. Therefore, the first part of this research begins by addressing the issue of the Pre-Contractual Civil Liability of Contracting Authorities, the principle of compensatio lucri cum damno and the respective admissibility of this principle in the context of Administrative Law. The second stage of this research concerns the admissibility of this principle in the context of the Pre-Contractual Civil Liability of Contracting Authorities, with a special focus on the case of unlawful rejection of a competitor in a public tender procedure and other similar cases.
Description
Keywords
Compensatio lucri cum damno Indemnização Vantagens Responsabilidade civil pré-contratual Compensação Entidades adjudicantes Dedução das vantagens Concorrente Damages Benefits Pre-contractual civil liability Compensation Contracting authorities Deduction of the benefits Competitor