| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.04 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Neste trabalho pretende-se analisar a motivação icónica de algumas propostas de denominações neológicas na área da Física acústica. Assim, far-se-á a correlação entre o referente icônico evocado pelo significante gestual e o conceito das neologias terminológicas SOM-FORTE, SOM-FRACO, SOM-GRAVE e SOM-AGUDO. Para esta análise adotaremos o modelo da iconicidade analógica de Taub (2001), desenhado no âmbito da linguística cognitiva, o qual define a iconicidade linguística como o mapeamento mental das estruturas preservadas nas relações de similaridade analógica entre forma e significado. A nossa análise das quatro neologias para conceitos de acústica revelou ambiguidades linguísticas entre as formas que denominam conceitos diferentes. Em alternativa, propomos a utilização do mapeamento icónico-metafórico (à luz de Taub) para a criação de expressões icónicas que não entrem em contradição com o conceito que buscam denominar, utilizando gestos do léxico comum da LSB, paráfrases de conceitos básicos em física e aproveitando a iconicidade visual de diversos materiais didáticos utilizados no ensino de Física.
In this paper our goal is analyze the iconic motivation of some neological denominations proposals in the area of Physic acoustics. Thus, the correlation between the iconic referent evoked by the sign’s significant and the terminological concept of LOUD-SOUND, WEAK-SOUND, LOW-SOUND and HIGH-SOUND will be made. For this analysis we will adopt Taub's analogical iconicity model (2001), designed in the context of cognitive linguistics, which defines linguistic iconicity as the mental mapping of structures preserved in analogical similarity relations between form and meaning. Our analysis of the four neological terms for acoustic concepts revealed linguistic ambiguities between the forms and concepts. Alternatively, we propose the use of the iconic-metaphorical mapping (as in Taub) for the creation of iconic expressions that do not contradict the concept that they pretend to name, using signs of the common lexicon of LSB, paraphrases of basic concepts in physics and taking advantage of the visual iconicity of several didactic materials used in the teaching of Physics.
In this paper our goal is analyze the iconic motivation of some neological denominations proposals in the area of Physic acoustics. Thus, the correlation between the iconic referent evoked by the sign’s significant and the terminological concept of LOUD-SOUND, WEAK-SOUND, LOW-SOUND and HIGH-SOUND will be made. For this analysis we will adopt Taub's analogical iconicity model (2001), designed in the context of cognitive linguistics, which defines linguistic iconicity as the mental mapping of structures preserved in analogical similarity relations between form and meaning. Our analysis of the four neological terms for acoustic concepts revealed linguistic ambiguities between the forms and concepts. Alternatively, we propose the use of the iconic-metaphorical mapping (as in Taub) for the creation of iconic expressions that do not contradict the concept that they pretend to name, using signs of the common lexicon of LSB, paraphrases of basic concepts in physics and taking advantage of the visual iconicity of several didactic materials used in the teaching of Physics.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Denominações neológicas da física Iconicidade Mapeamento icónico-metafórico Physics neological denominations Iconicity Double mapping