| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 431.77 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Abstract(s)
Introdução: A perfuração radicular é uma abertura que estabelece uma
comunicação entre o espaço pulpar e o ligamento periodontal, sendo
responsável por 10% das falhas produzidas em tratamentos endodônticos. Esta
revisão sistemática, será focada em comprovar a efetividade do CBCT na
deteção dessas complicações.
Materiais e Métodos: Foi feita a pesquisa nas plataformas Pubmed/MEDLINE,
Cochrane Library e Web of Science, com os termos Mesh definidos na estratégia
(root perforation OR tooth perforation) AND (Cone Beam OR CBCT).
Resultados: Dos 15 artigos incluídos nesta revisão sistemática, em que 73,33%
foram de estudos in vitro com dentes humanos e 26,67% foram relatos de casos
clínicos onde de igual forma se avaliava a efetividade do CBCT na deteção de
perfurações para posterior tratamento. Destes 15 estudos, 8 compararam a
efetividade do CBCT e os métodos convencionais na deteção de perfurações
radiculares, 4 artigos foram relatos de casos clínicos onde se usou e se
comparou o CBCT no diagnóstico desta complicação e 3 artigos de estudos de
investigação sobre o uso do CBCT em diferentes complicações endodônticas,
incluindo as perfurações radiculares.
Conclusões: O CBCT mostrou-se extremamente útil e confiável, com uma
precisão maior do que os métodos convencionais na deteção de perfurações
radiculares.
Introduction: Root perforation is an opening that establishes communication between the pulp space and the periodontal ligament, accounting for 10% of failures produced in endodontic treatments. This systematic review will focus on proving the effectiveness of CBCT in detecting these complications. Materials and Methods: A search was carried out on the Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science platforms, with the terms Mesh defined in the strategy (root perforation OR tooth perforation) AND (Cone Beam OR CBCT). Results: Of the 15 articles included in this systematic review, in which 73.33% were from in vitro studies with human teeth and 26.67% were reports of clinical cases where the effectiveness of CBCT in the detection of posterior perforations was also evaluated. treatment. Of these 15 studies, 8 compared the effectiveness of CBCT and conventional methods in detecting root perforations, 4 articles were reports of clinical cases where CBCT was used and compared in the diagnosis of this complication, and 3 articles were research studies on the use of CBCT in different endodontic complications, including root perforations. Conclusions: CBCT proved to be extremely useful and reliable, with greater accuracy than conventional methods in detecting root perforations.
Introduction: Root perforation is an opening that establishes communication between the pulp space and the periodontal ligament, accounting for 10% of failures produced in endodontic treatments. This systematic review will focus on proving the effectiveness of CBCT in detecting these complications. Materials and Methods: A search was carried out on the Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science platforms, with the terms Mesh defined in the strategy (root perforation OR tooth perforation) AND (Cone Beam OR CBCT). Results: Of the 15 articles included in this systematic review, in which 73.33% were from in vitro studies with human teeth and 26.67% were reports of clinical cases where the effectiveness of CBCT in the detection of posterior perforations was also evaluated. treatment. Of these 15 studies, 8 compared the effectiveness of CBCT and conventional methods in detecting root perforations, 4 articles were reports of clinical cases where CBCT was used and compared in the diagnosis of this complication, and 3 articles were research studies on the use of CBCT in different endodontic complications, including root perforations. Conclusions: CBCT proved to be extremely useful and reliable, with greater accuracy than conventional methods in detecting root perforations.
Description
Keywords
CBCT Perfurações radiculares Root perforations