| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 568.33 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Abstract(s)
O trabalho é cada vez mais considerado como o aspeto principal na vida do
sujeito, podendo muitas vezes tomar proporções inimagináveis colocando até o seu
bem-estar em causa. Com o aumento de ambientes cada vez mais desafiadores, vemos a
inovação e como uma alternativa para a incrementação da eficácia dentro das
organizações, constituindo um elemento critico para proporcionar as suas
competitividades. Deste modo, esta investigação tem como principal objetivo perceber
de que forma se pode relacionar a centralidade no trabalho, ou seja, as crenças
individuais em relação ao grau de importância que o trabalho desempenha na vida com
a liderança pró-ativa, considerada como um fenómeno social, uma influência
interpessoal exercida numa situação e dirigida através do processo de comunicação
humana, para a consecução de um ou mais objetivos específicos. É a chave para a
eficácia organizacional. A revisão bibliográfica foi desenvolvida com base em artigos
científicos de repositórios nacionais e internacionais de livre acesso, bem como em
livros relacionados com a temática. A metodologia adotada foi de natureza quantitativa,
sendo a população os trabalhadores a nível nacional que desempenhavam uma atividade
profissional de momento, sendo utilizado um processo de amostragem não
probabilístico. Para a coleta dos dados, foram utilizados três instrumentos fundamentais
para esta investigação sendo eles, o Questionário Sociodemográfico; a Escala de
Liderança Proativa (De Cremer, 2015, Tradução e Adaptação de Lobo F. & Lobo M.,
2015); e a Escala De Centralidade Do Trabalho (Lobo, Ferreira, Dias, Ferreira, Martins,
Moreira & Peixoto, 2013). O processo de recolha de dados ainda se encontra em
desenvolvimento. Para a sucessiva análise dos dados, recorreu-se ao programa
estatístico SPPS, versão 21. Os resultados obtidos não evidenciaram relações
estatisticamente significativas entre a Liderança Proativa e a Centralidade. Tais dados
podem evidenciar a necessidade de existência de estudos futuros.
The work is considered, each day, more as the main aspect of the subject's life, it can often take unimaginable proportions putting his well being at stake. With increasing environments increasingly challenging more, see Innovation and s an alternative for incrementing the efficiency within the organizations constituting hum critical element to provide as their competitiveness. As a result, this investigation has it's focus on the understanding on how we can relate the centrality of work, so, the individual beliefs into the degree of importance that the job performs on his life with with proactive leadership, regarded as a social phenomenon, interpersonal influence exercised in a situation and directed through the process of human communication to achieve one or more specific objectives. It is the key to organizational effectiveness. The bibliographic review was developed based on scientific articles from national and international repositories of free access, as well as books related to the theme. The methodology adopted was of a qualitative nature, with the population being workers at the national level who performed a professional activity at the moment, using a nonprobabilistic sampling process. In order to collect data, three fundamental instruments were used for this research: the Sociodemographic Questionnaire; The Proactive Leadership Scale (De Cremer, 2015; Translation and Adaptation of Lobo F. & Lobo M., 2015); and the Work Centrality Scale (Lobo, Ferreira, Dias, Ferreira, Martins, Moreira and Peixoto, 2013).The data collection process is still under development. For the subsequent analysis of the data, we used the statistical program SPPS, version 21. The results did not show statistically significant relationships between Proactive Leadership and Centrality. Such data may evidence the need for future studies.
The work is considered, each day, more as the main aspect of the subject's life, it can often take unimaginable proportions putting his well being at stake. With increasing environments increasingly challenging more, see Innovation and s an alternative for incrementing the efficiency within the organizations constituting hum critical element to provide as their competitiveness. As a result, this investigation has it's focus on the understanding on how we can relate the centrality of work, so, the individual beliefs into the degree of importance that the job performs on his life with with proactive leadership, regarded as a social phenomenon, interpersonal influence exercised in a situation and directed through the process of human communication to achieve one or more specific objectives. It is the key to organizational effectiveness. The bibliographic review was developed based on scientific articles from national and international repositories of free access, as well as books related to the theme. The methodology adopted was of a qualitative nature, with the population being workers at the national level who performed a professional activity at the moment, using a nonprobabilistic sampling process. In order to collect data, three fundamental instruments were used for this research: the Sociodemographic Questionnaire; The Proactive Leadership Scale (De Cremer, 2015; Translation and Adaptation of Lobo F. & Lobo M., 2015); and the Work Centrality Scale (Lobo, Ferreira, Dias, Ferreira, Martins, Moreira and Peixoto, 2013).The data collection process is still under development. For the subsequent analysis of the data, we used the statistical program SPPS, version 21. The results did not show statistically significant relationships between Proactive Leadership and Centrality. Such data may evidence the need for future studies.
Description
Keywords
Mundialização Centralidade do trabalho Liderança Personalidade Procrastinação Globalization Centrality of work Leadership Personality Procrastination