| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
O Evangelho de João desafia os leitores a contemplar uma profunda ironia: um rei sem os sinais externos da realeza. Porém, podemos obter uma compreensão mais completa da paixão ao integrar os diversos momentos narrados nos quatro Evangelhos. Este estudo busca investigar as diferenças entre estes relatos a fim de responder à pergunta sobre como cada um contribui para a nossa compreensão do evento central do cristianismo. Sob o título "Um Rei sem Coroa", o contexto narrativo de João apresenta Jesus de forma paradoxal: um rei divino desprovido dos sinais terrenos de realeza. O Evangelho de João destaca esta dualidade de maneira marcante, revelando a soberania de Jesus em contraste com a sua humilhação e rejeição pelo mundo. Portanto, este estudo visa a comparar os Evangelhos para melhor compreender o relato da Paixão como um todo, superando as narrativas individuais, pois, podemos dizer que Ele, no lugar da coroa de ouro teve uma de espinhos, no lugar do cetro de ouro uma cana de madeira e em vez do trono do poder uma cruz onde pode abraçar todo o povo.
John's Gospel challenges the reader to contemplate a profound irony: a king without the outward signs of royalty, whose power and sovereignty are undeniable. However, we can gain a more complete understanding of the Passion by integrating the various moments narrated in the four Gospels. This study seeks to investigate the differences between these narratives to answer the question of how each of them contributes to understanding the central event of Christianity. Under the title "A king without a crown", John's narrative context presents Jesus in a paradoxical way: a divine king without the earthly signs of kingship. John's Gospel highlights this duality in a remarkable way, revealing Jesus' sovereignty in contrast to his humiliation and rejection by the world. This study therefore aims to compare the Gospels in order to better understand the Passion story as a whole, going beyond the individual narratives: instead of the golden crown, he had a crown of thorns; instead of the golden sceptre, he had a wooden cane; and instead of the throne of power, he had a cross on which he could embrace all the people.
John's Gospel challenges the reader to contemplate a profound irony: a king without the outward signs of royalty, whose power and sovereignty are undeniable. However, we can gain a more complete understanding of the Passion by integrating the various moments narrated in the four Gospels. This study seeks to investigate the differences between these narratives to answer the question of how each of them contributes to understanding the central event of Christianity. Under the title "A king without a crown", John's narrative context presents Jesus in a paradoxical way: a divine king without the earthly signs of kingship. John's Gospel highlights this duality in a remarkable way, revealing Jesus' sovereignty in contrast to his humiliation and rejection by the world. This study therefore aims to compare the Gospels in order to better understand the Passion story as a whole, going beyond the individual narratives: instead of the golden crown, he had a crown of thorns; instead of the golden sceptre, he had a wooden cane; and instead of the throne of power, he had a cross on which he could embrace all the people.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Jo,18-19 Paixão Coroa Sinóticos Morte Sepultura Jn 18-19 Passion Crown Synoptics Death Burial