A carregar...
Publicação
O carácter histórico-hermenêutico da revelação e da sua formulação dogmática como manifestação da realidade mistérica e inefável da verdade divina
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 244.99 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Através de um diálogo interdisciplinar entre teologia e filosofia, pretendemos explicar nesta investigação por que razão os conteúdos da Revelação sagrada e as formulações dogmáticas da Tradição da Igreja nem sempre se apresentam em conformidade com o bem e a verdade que o ser humano procura em diálogo com Deus. A partir de uma fundamentação gnosiológica assente na noção de inadequação entre o pensar e o mistério inefável do Ser divino, procuramos justificar a necessidade da alteração das significações e das formulações concetuais acerca da fé e dos costumes religiosos ao longo da História através dos diversos sínodos e concílios. Tentaremos evidenciar o impacto da apropriação histórico- -cultural de determinados modelos filosófico-teológicos e o impacto do condicionamento sociopolítico na interpretação da Revelação e na sua formulação dogmática. Concluímos que através da aplicação do método fenomenológico-hermenêutico e do reconhecimento do carácter histórico-cultural da Revelação e da Tradição é possível uma aproximação à Verdade sem cedermos aos relativismos niilistas e sem cairmos no anacronismo da apropriação literal de ideias teológico-filosóficas do passado que já não dão sentido às vivências do presente. A fundamentação teológico-filosófica do carácter histórico-hermenêutico da verdade da Revelação e do carácter evolutivo da verdade dos dogmas, com o consequente questionamento da infalibilidade do Papa e da Igreja, apresenta-se como a principal originalidade deste estudo.
Through an interdisciplinary dialogue between theology and philosophy, we intend to explain in this research why the contents of sacred Revelation and the dogmatic formulations of the Church’s Tradition do not always appear in accordance with the good and truth that human beings seek in dialogue with God. Based on a gnosiological foundation based on the notion of inadequacy between thinking and the ineffable mystery of the divine Being, we seek to justify the need to change the meanings and conceptual formulations regarding faith and religious customs throughout History through the various synods and councils. We will attempt to highlight the impact of the historical-cultural appropriation of certain philosophical-theological models and the impact of sociopolitical conditioning on the interpretation of Revelation and its dogmatic formulation. We conclude that through the application of the phenomenological?hermeneutic method and the recognition of the historical?cultural character of Revelation and Tradition, it is possible to approach the Truth without giving in to nihilistic relativism and without falling into the anachronism of the literal appropriation of theological?philosophical ideas of the past that no longer give meaning to the experiences of the present. The metaphysical foundation of the evolutionary character of dogmas and the impossibility of papal infallibility is presented as the main originality of this study. The theological-philosophical foundation of the historical-hermeneutic character of the truth of Revelation and the evolutionary character of the truth of dogmas, with the consequent questioning of the infallibility of the Pope and the Church, is presented as the main originality of this study.
Through an interdisciplinary dialogue between theology and philosophy, we intend to explain in this research why the contents of sacred Revelation and the dogmatic formulations of the Church’s Tradition do not always appear in accordance with the good and truth that human beings seek in dialogue with God. Based on a gnosiological foundation based on the notion of inadequacy between thinking and the ineffable mystery of the divine Being, we seek to justify the need to change the meanings and conceptual formulations regarding faith and religious customs throughout History through the various synods and councils. We will attempt to highlight the impact of the historical-cultural appropriation of certain philosophical-theological models and the impact of sociopolitical conditioning on the interpretation of Revelation and its dogmatic formulation. We conclude that through the application of the phenomenological?hermeneutic method and the recognition of the historical?cultural character of Revelation and Tradition, it is possible to approach the Truth without giving in to nihilistic relativism and without falling into the anachronism of the literal appropriation of theological?philosophical ideas of the past that no longer give meaning to the experiences of the present. The metaphysical foundation of the evolutionary character of dogmas and the impossibility of papal infallibility is presented as the main originality of this study. The theological-philosophical foundation of the historical-hermeneutic character of the truth of Revelation and the evolutionary character of the truth of dogmas, with the consequent questioning of the infallibility of the Pope and the Church, is presented as the main originality of this study.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Dogma Hermenêutica Hermeneutics Infalibilidade Infallibility Revelação Revelation Tradição Tradition Truth Verdade
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Dimas, S. (2026). O carácter histórico-hermenêutico da revelação e da sua formulação dogmática como manifestação da realidade mistérica e inefável da verdade divina. Ephata, 8(1), 69-96. https://doi.org/10.34632/ephata.2026.17669