| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 245.72 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Este ensaio propõe-se analisar algumas teses de Vasco de Magalhães-Vilhena
a propósito do problema do conhecimento, nomeadamente, a doutrina chamado
do “refl exo”. O ponto de partida é a crítica que o autor dirige a António Sérgio,
cuja posição fi losófi ca caracteriza, acertadamente, como idealismo de inspiração
neo-kantiana. Magalhães-Vilhena aproxima a doutrina do refl exo, inspirada nas
investigações do fi siologista russo I. Pavlov, da noção de refl exão proposta por
Hegel na Segunda Parte da Ciência da Lógica. Neste ensaio, contesta-se a legitimi dade de tal aproximação. Por fi m, em confronto com as posições gnosiológicas de
Magalhães-Vilhena (cujo corolário é a dependência dos dados sensoriais relativa mente aos estímulos físicos), propõe-se uma análise do fenómeno do conhecimento
que tem por base o princípio da análise intencional defendido por Edmund Husserl
This paper aims to analyze some theses of Vasco de Magalhães-Vilhena regarding the problem of knowledge, namely, the so-called theory of the “refl ex”. The point of departure is the critic the author addresses to António Sérgio, whose philosophical position is correctly characterized as Neo-kantian Idealism.Magalhães-Vilhena aims to link the doctrine of the refl ex, inspired by the researchof the Russian physiologist I. Pavlov, to the concept of refl ection proposed byHegel in the Second Part of the Science of Logic. In this paper I question the legitimacy of this connection. At last, confronting the standpoint of Magalhães-Vilhena regarding gnosiological issues (whose corollary is the dependence of sense-datafrom physical stimuli) I propose an analysis of the phenomenon of knowledgebased in the principles of intentional analysis endorsed by Edmund Husserl.
This paper aims to analyze some theses of Vasco de Magalhães-Vilhena regarding the problem of knowledge, namely, the so-called theory of the “refl ex”. The point of departure is the critic the author addresses to António Sérgio, whose philosophical position is correctly characterized as Neo-kantian Idealism.Magalhães-Vilhena aims to link the doctrine of the refl ex, inspired by the researchof the Russian physiologist I. Pavlov, to the concept of refl ection proposed byHegel in the Second Part of the Science of Logic. In this paper I question the legitimacy of this connection. At last, confronting the standpoint of Magalhães-Vilhena regarding gnosiological issues (whose corollary is the dependence of sense-datafrom physical stimuli) I propose an analysis of the phenomenon of knowledgebased in the principles of intentional analysis endorsed by Edmund Husserl.
Description
Keywords
Idealismo Doutrina do reflexo Reflexão Intencionalidade Idealism Doctrine of the reflex Reflection Intentionality