| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 656.92 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
presente dissertação visa aferir se o regime consagrado na Lei n.º 67/2007 (RRCEE), à luz do artigo 22.º da CRP, se revela apto a enquadrar os danos decorrentes da utilização de sistemas de IA pela Administração Pública. Defende-se que o regime vigente evidencia suficiente elasticidade normativa, desde que objeto de uma interpretação evolutiva e sistematicamente orientada pelos princípios constitucionais, afirmando-se a responsabilidade por facto ilícito como eixo central de imputação. Com efeito, sustenta-se que as decisões automatizadas permanecem juridicamente reconduzíveis a condutas humanas relevantes, designadamente no âmbito dos deveres de organização, vigilância, controlo e cuidado tecnológico. Argumenta-se ainda que a inovação tecnológica não pode traduzir-se numa diminuição do nível de tutela dos particulares. O desafio não reside na construção de um novo paradigma de irresponsabilidade tecnológica, mas na reafirmação do princípio do Estado de Direito, assegurando que a modernização administrativa permanece subordinada às exigências de juridicidade, responsabilidade e proteção efetiva dos direitos fundamentais.
This dissertation seeks to assess whether the legal framework established by Law no. 67/2007 (RRCEE), considering Article 22 of the Portuguese Constitution, can encompass damages arising from the use of artificial intelligence systems by the Public Administration. It is argued that the current regime displays sufficient normative flexibility, provided it is subject to an evolutive interpretation systematically guided by constitutional principles, with liability for unlawful acts affirmed as the central axis of attribution. In this regard, automated decisions are considered to remain legally attributable to relevant human conduct, particularly in the sphere of duties of organisation, supervision, control, and technological due care. It is further maintained that technological innovation cannot result in a reduction of the level of protection afforded to individuals. The challenge does not lie in constructing a new paradigm of technological non-liability, but rather in reaffirming the principle of the rule of law, ensuring that administrative modernisation remains subject to the requirements of legality, accountability, and the effective protection of fundamental rights.
This dissertation seeks to assess whether the legal framework established by Law no. 67/2007 (RRCEE), considering Article 22 of the Portuguese Constitution, can encompass damages arising from the use of artificial intelligence systems by the Public Administration. It is argued that the current regime displays sufficient normative flexibility, provided it is subject to an evolutive interpretation systematically guided by constitutional principles, with liability for unlawful acts affirmed as the central axis of attribution. In this regard, automated decisions are considered to remain legally attributable to relevant human conduct, particularly in the sphere of duties of organisation, supervision, control, and technological due care. It is further maintained that technological innovation cannot result in a reduction of the level of protection afforded to individuals. The challenge does not lie in constructing a new paradigm of technological non-liability, but rather in reaffirming the principle of the rule of law, ensuring that administrative modernisation remains subject to the requirements of legality, accountability, and the effective protection of fundamental rights.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Inteligência artificial Administração Pública Responsabilidade civil extracontratual do Estado Responsabilidade por facto ilícito Decisão administrativa automatizada Risco tecnológico Direitos fundamentais Artificial intelligence Public administration Non-contractual state liability Liability for unlawful acts Automated administrative decision-making Technological risk Fundamental rights
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Editora
Licença CC
Sem licença CC
