Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
806.69 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A Responsabilidade Social das Organizações (RSO) é encarada como um dos temas de investigação do século vigente, apresentando-se com uma extensa e diversa evolução concetual, ao incluir novos constructos e dimensões, explicada pela crescente valorização e interesse da sociedade pela temática. Começou a ser estudada desde a segunda metade do século XX e o seu desenvolvimento gerou várias modelos e teorias. Nesse sentido, objetivou-se analisar os modelos de RSO, evidenciando a sua influência nas diferentes fases do conceito, recorrendo a uma metodologia qualitativa. Foram apresentados e analisados criticamente dez modelos, particularmente: teoria e modelo dos stakeholders; modelo piramidal de Carroll (1979); modelo bidimensional de Quazi e O’Brien (2000); modelo dos três domínios de Schwartz e Carroll (2003); modelo de mapeamento do território de Garriga e Melé (2004); modelo de 3C-SR de Meehan, Meehan e Richards (2006); modelo integrativo de Porter e Cramer (2006); modelo das três abordagens chave de Windsor (2006); modelo de VBA de Schwartz e Carroll (2008) e o modelo dos compromissos sociais de Almeida (2010). Em resultado, destaca-se a importância e a forte integração dos stakeholders na RSO, sendo um conceito transversal às diversas teorias revisadas.
Organizational Social Responsibility (OSR) is seen as one of the research themes of the current century, presenting itself with an extensive and diverse conceptual evolution, as it includes new constructs and dimensions, explained by the growing appreciation and interest of society in the subject. It started to be studied since the second half of the 20th century and its development generated several models and theories. In this sense, the objective was to analyze the models of OSR, evidencing their influence in the different phases of the concept, using a qualitative methodology. Ten models were presented and critically analyzed, particularly: stakeholder theory and model; Carroll's pyramidal model (1979); two-dimensional model by Quazi and O’Brien (2000); model of the three domains of Schwartz and Carroll (2003); mapping model of the territory of Garriga and Melé (2004); 3C-SR model by Meehan, Meehan and Richards (2006); integrative model by Porter and Cramer (2006); Windsor's three key approaches model (2006); VBA model by Schwartz and Carroll (2008) and the model of social commitments by Almeida (2010). As a result, the importance and strong integration of stakeholders in the OSR stands out, being a transversal concept in the various theories reviewed.
Organizational Social Responsibility (OSR) is seen as one of the research themes of the current century, presenting itself with an extensive and diverse conceptual evolution, as it includes new constructs and dimensions, explained by the growing appreciation and interest of society in the subject. It started to be studied since the second half of the 20th century and its development generated several models and theories. In this sense, the objective was to analyze the models of OSR, evidencing their influence in the different phases of the concept, using a qualitative methodology. Ten models were presented and critically analyzed, particularly: stakeholder theory and model; Carroll's pyramidal model (1979); two-dimensional model by Quazi and O’Brien (2000); model of the three domains of Schwartz and Carroll (2003); mapping model of the territory of Garriga and Melé (2004); 3C-SR model by Meehan, Meehan and Richards (2006); integrative model by Porter and Cramer (2006); Windsor's three key approaches model (2006); VBA model by Schwartz and Carroll (2008) and the model of social commitments by Almeida (2010). As a result, the importance and strong integration of stakeholders in the OSR stands out, being a transversal concept in the various theories reviewed.
Description
Keywords
Responsabilidade social das organizações Teorias Modelos Organizational social responsibility Theories Models