Repository logo
 
Publication

Comparison of a xenogeneic and an alloplastic material used in dental implants in terms of physico-chemical characteristics and in vivo inflammatory response

dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Andreia
dc.contributor.authorCoimbra, Patrícia
dc.contributor.authorCabrita, António
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Margarida
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-21T10:36:50Z
dc.date.available2021-09-21T10:36:50Z
dc.date.issued2013-08-01
dc.description.abstractTwo commercial bone grafts used in dentistry (Osteobiol Gen-Os®, a xenograft of porcine origin, and Bonelike®, a hydroxyapatite based synthetic material), in the form of granules, were characterized and evaluated in vivo regarding the intensity of the tissue inflammatory response. These biomaterials were characterized in terms of morphology, particle size distribution, porosity and pore size, specific surface area and density. The chemical composition and structure of the materials were accessed by Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray Diffraction (XRD). The graft materials were implanted in the gluteus maximus muscles of Wistar rats and the inflammatory response was evaluated through histological analysis, after one week of implantation. The results showed that the two grafts have quite different characteristics in practically all the evaluated properties. While Osteobiol® exhibits a structure and composition similar to the natural bone, Bonelike® is constituted by a main crystalline phase of hydroxyapatite and two secondary phases of α- and β-tricalcium phosphate. Osteobiol® granules, besides being larger, are irregular, and exhibit sharp-edged tips, while those of Bonelike® are approximately cylindrical, with round contours, and more uniform in size. The in vivo response evaluated from the inflammatory infiltrates revealed that although both implants did not cause severe inflammation, Bonelike® granules elicit a consistently more intense inflammatory reaction than that triggered by the granules of Osteobiol®, particularly in terms of collagen production and formation of fibrous capsule. This reaction was partly explained in terms of the characteristics evaluated for the granules of this material.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.msec.2013.04.047
dc.identifier.eid84878260943
dc.identifier.issn0928-4931
dc.identifier.pmid23706240
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/35044
dc.identifier.wos000320973000052
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectBone graftspt_PT
dc.subjectInflammatory responsept_PT
dc.subjectPhysico-chemical propertiespt_PT
dc.titleComparison of a xenogeneic and an alloplastic material used in dental implants in terms of physico-chemical characteristics and in vivo inflammatory responsept_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage3513pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue6pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage3506pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleMaterials Science and Engineering Cpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume33pt_PT
person.familyNameFigueiredo
person.familyNameCoimbra
person.familyNameGuerra
person.familyNameLopes Figueiredo
person.givenNameAndreia
person.givenNamePatrícia
person.givenNameFernando
person.givenNameMaria Margarida
person.identifier.ciencia-idDA1E-663F-418B
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0592-2851
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2209-0863
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8780-9379
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2868-8332
person.identifier.ridV-8898-2017
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55700193600
person.identifier.scopus-author-id6507327663
person.identifier.scopus-author-id15050495000
person.identifier.scopus-author-id7103355275
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9eb0f1e9-aaf6-4453-ba99-ffcbaf3c41e7
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcea2ee11-dadc-4dff-95f8-e53850bd1461
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6d591acb-4222-41fe-a422-590c7eba58d8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication51555251-92a3-48e0-a77b-89f7daaf560c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9eb0f1e9-aaf6-4453-ba99-ffcbaf3c41e7

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Comparison_of_a_xenogeneic_and_an_alloplastic_material.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format