Repository logo
 
Publication

Tensile strength assay comparing the resistance between two different autologous platelet concentrates (leucocyte-platelet rich fibrin versus advanced-platelet rich fibrin): a pilot study

dc.contributor.authorPascoal, Martim de Almeida Nóbrega Correia
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Nuno Bernardo Malta dos
dc.contributor.authorCompleto, António Manuel Godinho
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-12T16:48:58Z
dc.date.available2021-03-12T16:48:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-15
dc.description.abstractBackground: Since the leucocyte-platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) was published in 2001, many studies have been developed, analyzing its properties, and also verifying new possibilities to improve it. Thereby, it emerges the advanced-platelet rich fibrin (A-PRF) with a protocol that optimizes the properties obtained by the L-PRF. Nonetheless, there is a gap in the literature to landmark the evolutive process concerning the mechanical properties in specific the resistance to tensile strength which consequently may influence the time for membrane degradation. Thus, this study had the goal to compare the resistance to the traction of membranes produced with the original L-PRF and A-PRF protocols, being the first to this direct comparison. Findings: The harvest of blood from a healthy single person, with no history of anticoagulant usage. We performed the protocols described in the literature, within a total of 13 membranes produced for each protocol (n = 26). Afterward, the membranes were prepared and submitted to a traction test assessing the maximal and the average traction achieved for each membrane. The data were analyzed statistically using the unpaired t test. Regarding average traction, A-PRF obtained a value of 0.0288 N mm−2 and L-PRF 0.0192 N mm−2 (p < 0.05 using unpaired t test). For maximal traction, A-PRF obtained 0.0752 N mm−2 and L-PRF 0.0425 N mm−2 (p < 0.05 using unpaired t test). Conclusion: With this study, it was possible to conclude that indeed A-PRF has a significative higher maximal traction score and higher average traction compared to L-PRF, indicating that it had a higher resistance when two opposing forces are applied.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40729-020-00284-wpt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2198-4034
dc.identifier.pmid33447875
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/32192
dc.identifier.wos000607862300001
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectFibrinpt_PT
dc.subjectRupturept_PT
dc.subjectPlateletpt_PT
dc.subjectTensile strengthpt_PT
dc.subjectResistancept_PT
dc.titleTensile strength assay comparing the resistance between two different autologous platelet concentrates (leucocyte-platelet rich fibrin versus advanced-platelet rich fibrin): a pilot studypt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.titleInternational Journal of Implant Dentistrypt_PT
oaire.citation.volume7pt_PT
person.familyNameMalta dos Santos
person.familyNameCompleto
person.familyNameFernandes
person.givenNameNuno
person.givenNameAntónio
person.givenNameGustavo
person.identifier485427
person.identifier.ciencia-idE113-5FBF-F9EF
person.identifier.ciencia-idE41D-E5CF-E412
person.identifier.ciencia-idCF15-944E-9453
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6592-2290
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3972-8432
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3022-4390
person.identifier.ridO-1167-2013
person.identifier.ridB-3536-2014
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57193006291
person.identifier.scopus-author-id17134085500
person.identifier.scopus-author-id23396708100
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5734a26a-9cb4-4f02-bf3e-9902c73609ac
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7ccf68e7-d91c-47c9-aefe-c6bb404df40c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4272eabc-23c2-4bb4-bb30-621eb4a653c3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4272eabc-23c2-4bb4-bb30-621eb4a653c3

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
27808504.pdf
Size:
1.98 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format