| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 227.76 KB | Adobe PDF | |||
| 181.12 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Eurípides inovou ao encenar com uma Medeia de mentalidade heróica, filicida, mas com apoio divino, os paradoxos da mulher grega, dependente do nomosmasculino. Hélia glosa-o, debatendo o amor feminino num cenário opressivo, e expõe o ícore divino como causa do desvario anti-phýsis de Medeia.
Euripides innovated by using a Medea of heroic mentality, filicidal, but with divine support, to discuss the paradoxes of Greek womanhood, dependent on a male nómos. Helia follows him, discussing female love in an oppressive setting, and exposes the divine ichor as the cause of Medea’s anti-physis madness.
Euripides innovated by using a Medea of heroic mentality, filicidal, but with divine support, to discuss the paradoxes of Greek womanhood, dependent on a male nómos. Helia follows him, discussing female love in an oppressive setting, and exposes the divine ichor as the cause of Medea’s anti-physis madness.
Description
Keywords
Medeia Barbárie Ícore Hélia Correia Medea Nomos/physis Barbarism Euripides Ichor
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra