Repository logo
 
Publication

Microscopic inspection of the adhesive interface of composite onlays after cementation on low loading: an in vitro study

dc.contributor.authorMagalhães, Tiago
dc.contributor.authorFidalgo-Pereira, Rita
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Orlanda
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Óscar
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Filipe S.
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Júlio C. M.
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-19T15:26:24Z
dc.date.available2023-04-19T15:26:24Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-07
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study aimed to assess the layer thickness and microstructure of traditional resin-matrix cements and flowable resin-matrix composites at dentin and enamel to composite onlay interfaces after cementation on low loading magnitude. Materials and Methods: Twenty teeth were prepared and conditioned with an adhesive system for restoration with resin-matrix composite onlays manufactured by CAD-CAM. On cementation, tooth-to-onlay assemblies were distributed into four groups, including two traditional resin-matrix cements (groups M and B), one flowable resin-matrix composite (group G), and one thermally induced flowable composite (group V). After the cementation procedure, assemblies were cross-sectioned for inspection by optical microscopy at different magnification up to ×1000. Results: The layer thickness of resin-matrix cementation showed the highest mean values at around 405 µm for a traditional resin-matrix cement (group B). The thermally induced flowable resin-matrix composites showed the lowest layer thickness values. The resin-matrix layer thickness revealed statistical differences between traditional resin cement (groups M and B) and flowable resin-matrix composites (groups V and G) (p < 0.05). However, the groups of flowable resin-matrix composites did not reveal statistical differences (p < 0.05). The thickness of the adhesive system layer at around 7 µm and 12 µm was lower at the interfaces with flowable resin-matrix composites when compared to the adhesive layer at resin-matrix cements, which ranged from 12 µm up to 40 µm. Conclusions: The flowable resin-matrix composites showed adequate flowing even though the loading on cementation was performed at low magnitude. Nevertheless, significant variation in thickness of the cementation layer was noticed for flowable resin-matrix composites and traditional resin-matrix cements that can occur in chair-side procedures due to the clinical sensitivity and differences in rheological properties of the materials.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jfb14030148pt_PT
dc.identifier.eid85151166611
dc.identifier.issn2079-4983
dc.identifier.pmcPMC10058625
dc.identifier.pmid36976072
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/40896
dc.identifier.wos000957920800001
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectCementationpt_PT
dc.subjectDentinpt_PT
dc.subjectOnlaypt_PT
dc.subjectResin cementpt_PT
dc.subjectResin compositept_PT
dc.titleMicroscopic inspection of the adhesive interface of composite onlays after cementation on low loading: an in vitro studypt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue3pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Functional Biomaterialspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume14pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
67171967.pdf
Size:
5.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: