Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2.23 MB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Os cuidados paliativos são uma prioridade nos cuidados de saúde e como tal recomenda-se uma abordagem global, programada e planificada, de forma a englobar os diversos problemas da pessoa com necessidades paliativas. A avaliação e a promoção da esperança são descritas como indicadores de boa prática clínica. Objetivo: sintetizar a evidência disponível acerca da eficácia das intervenções promotoras de esperança, na esperança e qualidade de vida da pessoa adulta com necessidades paliativas. Material e Métodos: Revisão Sistemática da Literatura, do tipo efectiveness, tendo como base o protocolo do Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual: Systematic reviews of effectiveness (2019). As bases de dados pesquisadas incluíram: CINAHL complete (by EBSCO); PubMed; Nursing and Allied Health Collection (by EBSCO); Cochrane Library, including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE); PsycINFO; Mediclatina (by EBSCO); SciELO e LILACS. A pesquisa de estudos não publicados incluiu: Open Grey; RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal e Banco de teses da CAPES (Brasil). Foram considerados para inclusão nesta revisão os estudos publicados nos idiomas Inglês, Português e Espanhol. A pesquisa foi realizada em Maio de 2018 e os resultados foram analisados por dois investigadores. Resultados: Foram triados 59 estudos pela pesquisa nas bases de dados; 48 estudos identificados cumpriram critérios de elegibilidade e apenas 2 estudos reuniram critérios de inclusão. Procedemos à avaliação metodológica antes da sua inclusão na revisão. Conclusões: A realização deste trabalho demonstra ausência significativa da determinação da eficácia das intervenções promotoras de esperança, na esperança e qualidade de vida na pessoa com necessidades paliativas. Justifica-se a realização de uma futura investigação que contribua para a determinação efetiva das intervenções promotoras de esperança nesta população em particular.
Palliative care is a priority in health care and as such a comprehensive, planned and planned approach is recommended to address the diverse problems of the person with palliative needs. The evaluation and promotion of hope are described as indicators of good clinical practice. Objective: To synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness of hope-promoting interventions in the hope and quality of life of adults with palliative needs. Material and Methods: Systematic Review of the Literature, effectiveness type, based on the protocol of the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual: Systematic reviews of effectiveness (2019). The databases searched included: CINAHL complete (by EBSCO); PubMed; Nursing and Allied Health Collection (by EBSCO); Cochrane Library, including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE); PsycINFO; Mediclatin (by EBSCO); SciELO and LILACS. Research from unpublished studies included: Open Gray; RCAAP - Open Access Scientific Repository of Portugal and CAPES Thesis Bank (Brazil). For inclusion in this review, studies published in English, Portuguese and Spanish were considered. Results: 59 studies were screened by searching the databases; 48 identified studies met eligibility criteria and only 2 studies met inclusion criteria. We proceeded to the methodological assessment prior to its inclusion in the review. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a significant lack of determination of the effectiveness of interventions promoting hope, hope and quality of life in people with palliative needs. Further research is warranted to contribute to the effective determination of hope-promoting interventions in this particular population.
Palliative care is a priority in health care and as such a comprehensive, planned and planned approach is recommended to address the diverse problems of the person with palliative needs. The evaluation and promotion of hope are described as indicators of good clinical practice. Objective: To synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness of hope-promoting interventions in the hope and quality of life of adults with palliative needs. Material and Methods: Systematic Review of the Literature, effectiveness type, based on the protocol of the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual: Systematic reviews of effectiveness (2019). The databases searched included: CINAHL complete (by EBSCO); PubMed; Nursing and Allied Health Collection (by EBSCO); Cochrane Library, including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE); PsycINFO; Mediclatin (by EBSCO); SciELO and LILACS. Research from unpublished studies included: Open Gray; RCAAP - Open Access Scientific Repository of Portugal and CAPES Thesis Bank (Brazil). For inclusion in this review, studies published in English, Portuguese and Spanish were considered. Results: 59 studies were screened by searching the databases; 48 identified studies met eligibility criteria and only 2 studies met inclusion criteria. We proceeded to the methodological assessment prior to its inclusion in the review. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a significant lack of determination of the effectiveness of interventions promoting hope, hope and quality of life in people with palliative needs. Further research is warranted to contribute to the effective determination of hope-promoting interventions in this particular population.
Description
Keywords
Enfermagem Esperança Cuidados paliativos Qualidade de vida Nursing Hope Hopefulness Palliative care End of life care Quality of life
Citation
Publisher
CC License
Without CC licence