| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.99 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A presente dissertação analisa comparativamente o modo como as cidades de Berlim e do Porto integram a arte urbana nas suas políticas culturais e turísticas, avaliando o seu potencial enquanto recurso estratégico no turismo cultural e criativo. Com base em cinco objetivos específicos, o estudo procura compreender de que forma os poderes públicos, as parcerias e as iniciativas privadas interagem na promoção da arte urbana, e que impactos essas ações produzem em termos culturais, simbólicos e territoriais. A metodologia baseou-se numa análise documental e qualitativa comparativa, recorrendo a fontes institucionais, plataformas digitais, literatura científica, dados estatísticos e a uma entrevista com um gestor municipal do Porto. Os resultados evidenciam que Berlim dispõe de um modelo de governança partilhada e de uma estrutura institucional consolidada, articulando políticas culturais, urbanas e turísticas. No Porto, predomina uma abordagem fragmentada, com menor articulação intersectorial e maior dependência da ação municipal. A investigação identifica ainda desafios transversais à valorização da arte urbana enquanto ativo turístico, como a mercantilização simbólica, o risco de gentrificação e a seletividade das políticas culturais. Conclui-se que, apesar das diferenças estruturais entre Porto e Berlim, a arte urbana revela potencial para contribuir para o desenvolvimento urbano sustentável, desde que ancorada em políticas públicas coerentes, participativas e sensíveis às dinâmicas locais.
This dissertation presents a comparative analysis of how the cities of Berlin and Porto integrate urban art into their cultural and tourism policies, assessing its potential as a strategic resource in cultural and creative tourism. Based on five specific objectives, the study aims to understand how public authorities, partnerships and private initiatives interact in promoting urban art, and what cultural, symbolic and territorial impacts these processes generate. The methodology relied on comparative documentary and qualitative analysis, using institutional sources, digital platforms, academic literature, statistical data and an interview with a municipal manager from Porto. The findings show that Berlin follows a shared governance model and has a consolidated institutional structure that integrates cultural, urban and tourism policies. Porto, in contrast, exhibits a more fragmented approach, marked by weaker intersectoral coordination and greater dependence on municipal action. The study also highlights challenges common to the cultural valorisation of urban art, including symbolic commodification, the risk of gentrification and selective cultural policy frameworks. It concludes that, despite structural differences between Porto and Berlin, urban art holds potential to contribute to sustainable urban development, provided it is embedded in coherent, participatory public strategies that are responsive to local dynamics.
This dissertation presents a comparative analysis of how the cities of Berlin and Porto integrate urban art into their cultural and tourism policies, assessing its potential as a strategic resource in cultural and creative tourism. Based on five specific objectives, the study aims to understand how public authorities, partnerships and private initiatives interact in promoting urban art, and what cultural, symbolic and territorial impacts these processes generate. The methodology relied on comparative documentary and qualitative analysis, using institutional sources, digital platforms, academic literature, statistical data and an interview with a municipal manager from Porto. The findings show that Berlin follows a shared governance model and has a consolidated institutional structure that integrates cultural, urban and tourism policies. Porto, in contrast, exhibits a more fragmented approach, marked by weaker intersectoral coordination and greater dependence on municipal action. The study also highlights challenges common to the cultural valorisation of urban art, including symbolic commodification, the risk of gentrification and selective cultural policy frameworks. It concludes that, despite structural differences between Porto and Berlin, urban art holds potential to contribute to sustainable urban development, provided it is embedded in coherent, participatory public strategies that are responsive to local dynamics.
Description
Keywords
Arte urbana Turismo cultural Políticas públicas Turismo criativo Berlim Porto Urban art Cultural tourism Public policy Creative tourism Berlin
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
CC License
Without CC licence
