| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 784.99 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
No rescaldo da crise da dívida europeia de 2010, a prática de incentivos por parte das empresas de investimento em relação à prestação de serviços de investimento aos seus clientes tem sido um assunto extremamente controverso. Apesar de ser uma prática corrente das instituições financeiras, a receção de incentivos pagos por terceiros tem sido amplamente considerada como um fator importante que pode gerar conflitos de interesses entre a empresa de investimento e o cliente.
In the aftermath of the 2010 European debt crisis, the practice of inducements by investment firms in relation to the provision of investment services to their clients has been an exceedingly controversial subject. Despite being a common practice of day-to day conduct of business by financial institutions, the receiving of inducements payed by a third party has been widely regarded as a major factor from which conflicts of interest might arise between the investment firm and the client.
In the aftermath of the 2010 European debt crisis, the practice of inducements by investment firms in relation to the provision of investment services to their clients has been an exceedingly controversial subject. Despite being a common practice of day-to day conduct of business by financial institutions, the receiving of inducements payed by a third party has been widely regarded as a major factor from which conflicts of interest might arise between the investment firm and the client.
Description
Keywords
Inducements MiFID II Conflict of interest Duty to act in the best interest of the client ESMA Independent investment advice Portfolio management Research Investor protection
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
Universidade Católica Editora