A carregar...
Publicação
Contributos da supervisão clínica de pares para a qualidade e segurança dos cuidados de enfermagem: scoping review
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 638.8 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Enquadramento: A supervisão clínica contribui para o desenvolvimento profissional, aperfeiçoamento da qualidade dos cuidados e segurança dos pacientes, uma vez que, proporciona um ambiente de aprendizagem colaborativa entre os enfermeiros, permitindo a avaliação de evidências e reflexão crítica sobre suas práticas. Objetivo: Mapear a evidência científica sobre a contribuição da supervisão clínica de pares para a qualidade e segurança dos cuidados de enfermagem. Métodos: Scoping review orientada pela metodologia proposta pelo Joanna Briggs Institute. Pesquisa realizada nas bases de dados: CINAHL®, Nursing & Allied Health Collection, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Library, MedicLatina, via EBSCOhost. Considerados os estudos redigidos em inglês, português e espanhol publicados nos últimos cinco anos. Dois revisores independentes procederam à análise de relevância dos estudos, extração e síntese dos dados, com elaboração do respetivo fluxograma. Resultados: Foram identificados 22 estudos, tendo emergido três categorias: contribuição direta, contribuição indireta e contribuição inconclusiva para a qualidade e segurança dos cuidados de enfermagem. A contribuição indireta foi subdividida em quatro subcategorias: apoio e orientação, desenvolvimento profissional, desenvolvimento de competências emocionais e satisfação profissional. Conclusões: O processo de supervisão clínica de pares é uma estratégia valiosa não apenas para aprimorar a qualidade e segurança dos cuidados de enfermagem, mas também para promover o desenvolvimento profissional e o bem-estar dos enfermeiros.
Background: Clinical supervision contributes to professional development, improvement of the quality of care and safety of patients, as it provides a collaborative learning environment among nurses, allowing the evaluation of evidence and critical reflection on their practices. Objective: Map the scientific evidence on the contribution of clinical peer supervision for the quality and safety of nursing care. Methods: Scoping review guided by the methodology proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Research carried out in the following databases: CINAHL®, Nursing & Allied Health Collection, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Library, MedicLatina, via EBSCOhost. Studies written in English, Portuguese and Spanish published in the last five years were considered. Two independent reviewers analyzed relevance of studies, extraction and synthesis of data, with preparation of the respective flowchart. Results: A total of 22 studies were identified, and three categories emerged: direct contribution, indirect contribution and contribution inconclusive for the quality and safety of nursing care. Indirect contribution was subdivided into four subcategories: support and guidance, professional development, development of emotional skills and professional satisfaction. Conclusions: The process of clinical peer supervision is a valuable strategy not only to enhance the quality and safety of nursing care, but also to promote the professional development and well-being of nurses.
Background: Clinical supervision contributes to professional development, improvement of the quality of care and safety of patients, as it provides a collaborative learning environment among nurses, allowing the evaluation of evidence and critical reflection on their practices. Objective: Map the scientific evidence on the contribution of clinical peer supervision for the quality and safety of nursing care. Methods: Scoping review guided by the methodology proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Research carried out in the following databases: CINAHL®, Nursing & Allied Health Collection, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Library, MedicLatina, via EBSCOhost. Studies written in English, Portuguese and Spanish published in the last five years were considered. Two independent reviewers analyzed relevance of studies, extraction and synthesis of data, with preparation of the respective flowchart. Results: A total of 22 studies were identified, and three categories emerged: direct contribution, indirect contribution and contribution inconclusive for the quality and safety of nursing care. Indirect contribution was subdivided into four subcategories: support and guidance, professional development, development of emotional skills and professional satisfaction. Conclusions: The process of clinical peer supervision is a valuable strategy not only to enhance the quality and safety of nursing care, but also to promote the professional development and well-being of nurses.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Supervisão de enfermagem Preceptoria Qualidade da assistência à saúde Cuidados de enfermagem Segurança do paciente Nursing care Nursing supervision Patient safety Preceptorship Quality of health care
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Editora
Instituto Piaget