Publication
Comparative study of green and traditional routes for cellulose extraction from a sugarcane by-product
| dc.contributor.author | Casanova, Francisca | |
| dc.contributor.author | Freixo, Ricardo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pereira, Carla F. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ribeiro, Alessandra B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Costa, Eduardo M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pintado, Manuela E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ramos, Óscar L. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-06T16:35:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-06T16:35:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-03-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Sugarcane bagasse (SCB) is the main residue of the sugarcane industry and a promising renewable and sustainable lignocellulosic material. The cellulose component of SCB, present at 40–50%, can be used to produce value-added products for various applications. Herein, we present a comprehensive and comparative study of green and traditional approaches for cellulose extraction from the by-product SCB. Green methods of extraction (deep eutectic solvents, organosolv, and hydrothermal processing) were compared to traditional methods (acid and alkaline hydrolyses). The impact of the treatments was evaluated by considering the extract yield, chemical profile, and structural properties. In addition, an evaluation of the sustainability aspects of the most promising cellulose extraction methods was performed. Among the proposed methods, autohydrolysis was the most promising approach in cellulose extraction, yielding 63.5% of a solid fraction with ca. 70% cellulose. The solid fraction showed a crystallinity index of 60.4% and typical cellulose functional groups. This approach was demonstrated to be environmentally friendly, as indicated by the green metrics assessed (E(nvironmental)-factor = 0.30 and Process Mass Intensity (PMI) = 20.5). Autohydrolysis was shown to be the most cost-effective and sustainable approach for the extraction of a cellulose-rich extract from SCB, which is extremely relevant for aiming the valorization of the most abundant by-product of the sugarcane industry. | pt_PT |
| dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/polym15051251 | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.eid | 85149726932 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2073-4360 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 36904494 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/40453 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 000947026300001 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | pt_PT |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | pt_PT |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Green chemistry | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Auto-hydrolysis | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Deep eutectic solvents | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Green metrics | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Cellulose | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Sugarcane bagasse | pt_PT |
| dc.title | Comparative study of green and traditional routes for cellulose extraction from a sugarcane by-product | pt_PT |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 19 | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.issue | 5 | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 1 | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.title | Polymers | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.volume | 15 | pt_PT |
| rcaap.rights | openAccess | pt_PT |
| rcaap.type | article | pt_PT |