Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
673.77 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Quando se trata de apreciar a relação entre Burke e Rousseau a posição mais comum é considerar, a partir do pensamento dos dois autores, que eles estão em polos opostos. Apesar das divergências, aquilo que alguns estudiosos, conhecedores quer de um quer de outro autor, afirmam é que a acepção que os interpreta como opostos se baseia numa apreciação superficial e que, se pusermos de parte o preconceito e as aparentes divergências, encontraremos mais pontos de contacto do que esperaríamos encontrar. Este artigo limitar-se-á à análise das diferenças entre os dois autores no que respeita à concepção da natureza do homem na sua relação com a sociedade.
When the relationship between Burke and Rousseau is being evaluated, the most common stance is to consider that these two authors are at opposite poles. What some specialists, acquainted with both authors, assert is that the interpretation that sees them as opposites is based on a superficial evaluation and that, if we set aside any preconceptions and apparent divergences, we would find more common ground than we expected. This article aims to analyse the differences in the way of thinking of each of them as regards the concept of human nature.
When the relationship between Burke and Rousseau is being evaluated, the most common stance is to consider that these two authors are at opposite poles. What some specialists, acquainted with both authors, assert is that the interpretation that sees them as opposites is based on a superficial evaluation and that, if we set aside any preconceptions and apparent divergences, we would find more common ground than we expected. This article aims to analyse the differences in the way of thinking of each of them as regards the concept of human nature.
Description
Keywords
Natureza humana Filosofia Burke Rousseau Human nature Philosophy