| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 635.4 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
A crítica que o jovem Marx dirige contra a religião, em geral, e contra o argumento ontológico, em particular, constitui um ponto de intersecção entre a filosofia marxiana e a fenomenologia radical de Michel Henry. Ao rejeitar a noção de um Deus transcendente, bem como as provas racionais da sua existência, o Marx de Henry refuta, por um lado, todas as críticas da religião que se situam na esfera da pura racionalidade como permite, por outro, conceber uma religiosidade assente na noção de um Deus radicalmente imanente.
The critique that the young Marx addresses against religion, in general, and against the ontological argument, in particular, constitutes a point of intersection between the Marxian philosophy and Michel Henry's radical phenomenology. On the one hand, by rejecting the notion of a transcendent God as well as the rational proofs of his existence, Henry's interpretation of Marx refutes all critiques of religion that lie in the sphere of pure rationality. On the other hand, from this hermeneutic of Marx arises a conception of a religiosity based on the notion of a pure immanent God.
The critique that the young Marx addresses against religion, in general, and against the ontological argument, in particular, constitutes a point of intersection between the Marxian philosophy and Michel Henry's radical phenomenology. On the one hand, by rejecting the notion of a transcendent God as well as the rational proofs of his existence, Henry's interpretation of Marx refutes all critiques of religion that lie in the sphere of pure rationality. On the other hand, from this hermeneutic of Marx arises a conception of a religiosity based on the notion of a pure immanent God.
Description
Keywords
Karl Marx Michel Henry Fenomenologia da vida Argumento ontológico Ontological argument Phenomenology of life