| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 265.15 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
In response to Seixas (2026), we endorse prospective protocol publication as a core mechanism for transparency and accountability in evidence synthesis. We argue, however, that persistently low uptake reflects not only cultural and educational gaps but also structural disincentives: the financial burden of APCs and the bibliometric “citation penalty” that discourages journals from hosting protocols. Drawing on the Portuguese/Southern European context, we highlight the strategic role of diamond open access journals in sustaining protocol publication where APC-based models create inequities. We propose actionable pathways to normalize protocol publication, including earmarked funder support for protocol costs, metric reforms that avoid penalizing protocols, a pragmatic complementarity between registry-based and journal-based protocols, and investment in diamond OA infrastructure. Aligning funding, evaluation, and editorial incentives is essential to move protocol publication from normative ideal to routine practice.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Evidence synthesis Review protocol Transparency Free science publishing Research integrity
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Editora
Universidade Fernando Pessoa
