Repository logo
 
Publication

Impact of truncating diffusion MRI scans on diffusional kurtosis imaging

dc.contributor.authorFouto, Ana R.
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, Rafael N.
dc.contributor.authorGolub, Marc
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Andreia C.
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Tagle, Amparo
dc.contributor.authorEsteves, Inês
dc.contributor.authorGil-Gouveia, Raquel
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Nuno A.
dc.contributor.authorVilela, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Patrícia
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Rita G.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-27T11:48:42Z
dc.date.available2024-03-27T11:48:42Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-01
dc.description.abstractObjective Difusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) extends difusion tensor imaging (DTI), characterizing non-Gaussian difusion efects but requires longer acquisition times. To ensure the robustness of DKI parameters, data acquisition ordering should be optimized allowing for scan interruptions or shortening. Three methodologies were used to examine how reduced difusion MRI scans impact DKI histogram-metrics: 1) the electrostatic repulsion model (OptEEM); 2) spherical codes (OptSC); 3) random (RandomTRUNC). Materials and methods Pre-acquired difusion multi-shell data from 14 female healthy volunteers (29±5 years) were used to generate reordered data. For each strategy, subsets containing diferent amounts of the full dataset were generated. The subsampling efects were assessed on histogram-based DKI metrics from tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) skeletonized maps. To evaluate each subsampling method on simulated data at diferent SNRs and the infuence of subsampling on in vivo data, we used a 3-way and 2-way repeated measures ANOVA, respectively. Results Simulations showed that subsampling had diferent efects depending on DKI parameter, with fractional anisotropy the most stable (up to 5% error) and radial kurtosis the least stable (up to 26% error). RandomTRUNC performed the worst while the others showed comparable results. Furthermore, the impact of subsampling varied across distinct histogram characteristics, the peak value the least afected (OptEEM: up to 5% error; OptSC: up to 7% error) and peak height (OptEEM: up to 8% error; OptSC: up to 11% error) the most afected. Conclusion The impact of truncation depends on specifc histogram-based DKI metrics. The use of a strategy for optimizing the acquisition order is advisable to improve DKI robustness to exam interruptions.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10334-024-01153-ypt_PT
dc.identifier.issn0968-5243
dc.identifier.pmid38393541
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/44421
dc.identifier.wos001169810600001
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectDiffusion MRI (dMRI)pt_PT
dc.subjectDiffusion tensor imaging (DTI)pt_PT
dc.subjectDiffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI)pt_PT
dc.subjectHistogram-metricspt_PT
dc.subjectSubsamplingpt_PT
dc.titleImpact of truncating diffusion MRI scans on diffusional kurtosis imagingpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage872
oaire.citation.issue5
oaire.citation.startPage859
oaire.citation.titleMagnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology, and Medicinept_PT
oaire.citation.volume37
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
95563763.pdf
Size:
5.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: