Repository logo
 
Publication

A comparative study of drying technologies for apple and ginger pomace: kinetic modeling and antioxidant properties

dc.contributor.authorAraujo, Beatriz Z. R.
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Valter F. R.
dc.contributor.authorPintado, Manuela E.
dc.contributor.authorMorais, Rui M. S. C.
dc.contributor.authorMorais, Alcina M. M. B.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-30T16:39:27Z
dc.date.available2024-09-30T16:39:27Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-26
dc.description.abstractApple and ginger mixed pomace is a by-product that can be valorized by drying. In this study, mixed pomace was subjected to hot-air drying (HAD) at 45, 62, and 70 °C and stepwise at 45 °C followed by at 62 °C or the reverse, at 62 °C followed by at 45 °C (2.5 mm layer), and microwave drying (MWD) at 100, 180, and 300 W (2.5 mm and 1.5 mm layers) and stepwise at 100 W followed by at 3000 W (2.5 mm layer). The results show that the Crank model well fitted the HAD kinetics, with a water effective diffusivity (Deff) of 2.28 ± 0.06 × 10−10–4.83 ± 0.16 × 10−10 m2/s and energy of activation of 23.9 kJ/mol. The step approach of drying at 45 °C followed by at 62 °C resulted in a higher Deff than the reverse approach (drying at 62 °C followed by at 45 °C). The Midilli et al. model presented a good fit for the MWD kinetics. The drying time was calculated using these models to achieve 12% moisture content in the pomace and found to be 125.0 ± 9.2–439.5 ± 118.2 min for HAD, and 11.1 ± 0.2–61.5 ± 6.0 min for MWD. The specific energy required was 410.78 ± 6.30–763.79 ± 205.4 kWh/kg and 1.32 ± 0.01–2.26 ± 0.05 kWh/kg, respectively. MWD at 180 W preserved the total phenolic content and the antioxidant activity (ABTS, DPPH) better than HAD at 62 °C. The former technology also preserved the pomace color well, with a low color difference, ΔE, of 7.39 ± 1.1. Therefore, MWD is more promising than HAD to dry apple and ginger pomace, reducing the environmental impact of the drying process due to its lower energy consumption, shorter drying time, and better quality. The dried product could be converted into apple and ginger pomace flour to be used as a novel food ingredient.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/pr12102096pt_PT
dc.identifier.eid85207413911
dc.identifier.issn2227-9717
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/46785
dc.identifier.wos001341826500001
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectApple and ginger pomacept_PT
dc.subjectDryingpt_PT
dc.subjectMathematical modelspt_PT
dc.subjectWater activitypt_PT
dc.subjectColourpt_PT
dc.subjectAntioxidant activitypt_PT
dc.titleA comparative study of drying technologies for apple and ginger pomace: kinetic modeling and antioxidant propertiespt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage18pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue10pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleProcessespt_PT
oaire.citation.volume12pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
106129774.pdf
Size:
2.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: