Repository logo
 
Publication

Estimation bias and agreement limits between two common self-report methods of habitual sleep duration in epidemiological surveys

2024-12Journal article Open access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKorman, Maria
dc.contributor.authorZarina, Daria
dc.contributor.authorTkachev, Vadim
dc.contributor.authorMerikanto, Ilona
dc.contributor.authorBjorvatn, Bjørn
dc.contributor.authorBjelajac, Adrijana Koscec
dc.contributor.authorPenzel, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorLandtblom, Anne Marie
dc.contributor.authorBenedict, Christian
dc.contributor.authorChan, Ngan Yin
dc.contributor.authorWing, Yun Kwok
dc.contributor.authorDauvilliers, Yves
dc.contributor.authorMorin, Charles M.
dc.contributor.authorMatsui, Kentaro
dc.contributor.authorNadorff, Michael
dc.contributor.authorBolstad, Courtney J.
dc.contributor.authorChung, Frances
dc.contributor.authorMota-Rolim, Sérgio
dc.contributor.authorGennaro, Luigi De
dc.contributor.authorPlazzi, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorYordanova, Juliana
dc.contributor.authorHolzinger, Brigitte
dc.contributor.authorPartinen, Markku
dc.contributor.authorReis, Cátia
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-21T14:00:38Z
dc.date.available2024-02-21T14:00:38Z
dc.date.issued2024-12
dc.description.abstractAccurate measurement of habitual sleep duration (HSD) is crucial for understanding the relationship between sleep and health. This study aimed to assess the bias and agreement limits between two commonly used short HSD self-report methods, considering sleep quality (SQ) and social jetlag (SJL) as potential predictors of bias. Data from 10,268 participants in the International COVID Sleep Study-II (ICOSS-II) were used. Method-Self and Method-MCTQ were compared. Method-Self involved a single question about average nightly sleep duration (HSDself), while Method-MCTQ estimated HSD from reported sleep times on workdays (HSDMCTQwork) and free days (HSDMCTQfree). Sleep quality was evaluated using a Likert scale and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) to explore its influence on estimation bias. HSDself was on average 42.41 ± 67.42 min lower than HSDMCTQweek, with an agreement range within ± 133 min. The bias and agreement range between methods increased with poorer SQ. HSDMCTQwork showed less bias and better agreement with HSDself compared to HSDMCTQfree. Sleep duration irregularity was − 43.35 ± 78.26 min on average. Subjective sleep quality predicted a significant proportion of variance in HSDself and estimation bias. The two methods showed very poor agreement and a significant systematic bias, both worsening with poorer SQ. Method-MCTQ considered sleep intervals without adjusting for SQ issues such as wakefulness after sleep onset but accounted for sleep irregularity and sleeping in on free days, while Method-Self reflected respondents’ interpretation of their sleep, focusing on their sleep on workdays. Including an SQ-related question in surveys may help bidirectionally adjust the possible bias and enhance the accuracy of sleep-health studies.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-024-53174-1pt_PT
dc.identifier.eid85184789886
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.pmid38341476
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/44056
dc.identifier.wos001160069200009
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.titleEstimation bias and agreement limits between two common self-report methods of habitual sleep duration in epidemiological surveyspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleScientific Reportspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume14pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
94460273.pdf
Size:
2.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

CRC-W - Contribuições em Revistas Científicas / Contribution to Journals