Publicação
Schools' evaluation drift: inconsistencies and interpellations of a high-stake inspection system
| datacite.subject.sdg | 04:Educação de Qualidade | |
| dc.contributor.author | Serra, Lídia Jesus Pecegueiro | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alves, José Matias | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-05T14:40:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-05T14:40:02Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-12-29 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A consensus exists in transnational educational policy regarding the relevance of accountability and the contribution of school evaluation to education quality. This paper scrutinises the evaluation results of Portuguese schools provided by the Inspectorate services using a pairwise comparison between 194 schools evaluated in 2018-2020 and 2021-2023. Regarding the literature gap on the behaviour of accountability systems over time, this study can contribute to a reflection on justice and transparency in high-stakes systems. The findings suggest that (i) the external evaluation results drift following a directional evolutionary model, indicating progression concerning the self-evaluation, educational services, and results domains; (ii) the occurrence of standardisation and leadership legitimisation phenomenon; (iii) possible side ecects in the schools' evaluation process, namely evasive behaviour, apparent and constructed realities, and evaluation distortion; (iv) the external evaluation framework flexibility in accommodating territorial dicerences between schools without producing system disadvantage. Departing from insights into how a high-stakes external evaluation system operates over time, the study ocers an empirically grounded assumption that reveals dynamics not unique to Portugal, but characteristic of accountability regimes adopted across many educational systems. In conclusion, to improve the quality of education, low-stakes accountability systems should be implemented to strengthen transparent schools' autonomy. | eng |
| dc.identifier.citation | Serra, L. J. P., & Alves, J. M. (2025). Schools' evaluation drift: inconsistencies and interpellations of a high-stake inspection system. Educational Point, 2(2), Article e139. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/17660 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.71176/edup/17660 | |
| dc.identifier.other | 0f3c732a-e7a2-425e-80c1-3c8ea264bab1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/56156 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Accountability | |
| dc.subject | External evaluation | |
| dc.subject | High-stakes system | |
| dc.subject | Legitimation | |
| dc.subject | Organised hypocrisy | |
| dc.subject | Trust | |
| dc.title | Schools' evaluation drift: inconsistencies and interpellations of a high-stake inspection system | eng |
| dc.type | research article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 2 | |
| oaire.citation.title | Educational Point | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 2 | |
| oaire.version | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
Ficheiros
Principais
1 - 1 de 1