| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 851.27 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Com o lançamento deste nĂșmero celebramos o inĂcio do quarto ano depublicação da Gaudium Sciendi. O balanço do trabalho atĂ© agora realizado Ă© positivo tal como se verifica atravĂ©s do aumento do nĂșmero de consultas ao siteda revista na Internet e do fluxo constante de propostas de publicação, tanto em PortuguĂȘs como em InglĂȘs e FrancĂȘs. Uma das caracterĂsticas da revista Ă© o facto de ser electrĂłnica e de acesso aberto. Este atributo tanto pode ser considerado positivo como negativo, conforme a visĂŁo dos nossos leitores. O debate sobre os benefĂcios da "tecnoliteracia" Ă© actualmente um dos tĂłpicos mais discutidos, sobretudo na ĂĄrea da educação. Relativamente Ă interacção entre a palavra e a imagem, sabemos que, apesar de terem identidades prĂłprias, a combinação do verbal e do icĂłnico promove e intensifica novas interpretaçÔes do texto, por isso, escolhemos a chamada "abordagem das mĂșltiplas literacias" para a Gaudium Sciendi. ConcluĂmos o Editorial com referĂȘncias aos diferentes artigos.
With the publication of this number we celebrate the 4th year of Gaudium Sciendi. The balance of the work done up to now is positive as we can conclude from the increase of the number of visitors to our site and the permanent flow of proposals for publication in Portuguese, English and French. One of the distinguishing characteristics of our review is the fact that it is on-line and open access. This may be considered both positive and negative, according to our readers' perspective. The debate about the advantageof "technoliteracy" is one of the most discussed topics nowadays mainly in the scope of education. As to the interaction between word and image, we know that, in spite of having their own identities, thecombination of the verbal and the iconic promotes and intensifies new interpretations of the text, we have, therefore, chosen the so-called "multiple literacy approach" for Gaudium Sciendi. To conclude the Editorial we make several references to the different articles.
With the publication of this number we celebrate the 4th year of Gaudium Sciendi. The balance of the work done up to now is positive as we can conclude from the increase of the number of visitors to our site and the permanent flow of proposals for publication in Portuguese, English and French. One of the distinguishing characteristics of our review is the fact that it is on-line and open access. This may be considered both positive and negative, according to our readers' perspective. The debate about the advantageof "technoliteracy" is one of the most discussed topics nowadays mainly in the scope of education. As to the interaction between word and image, we know that, in spite of having their own identities, thecombination of the verbal and the iconic promotes and intensifies new interpretations of the text, we have, therefore, chosen the so-called "multiple literacy approach" for Gaudium Sciendi. To conclude the Editorial we make several references to the different articles.
Description
Keywords
MĂșltiplas literacias Tecnoliteracia Balanço positivo do trabalho Multiple literacies Technoliteracy Positive evaluation of the publication
