| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 545.86 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
This article proposes “double foreignness” as a methodological prompt for analyzing the writing of a foreign country’s history, where spatiotemporal distance is compounded by cultural-linguistic distance. It examines José de Freitas’s A China antiga e moderna [Ancient and Modern China] (1941), a Portuguese popular history volume that connects China’s past to the Second Sino-Japanese War for early-1940s readers. Through Lefevere’s ([1992] 2017) concept of rewriting, the study shows how Freitas selectively rewrites francophone sources into Portuguese within a popularizing editorial framework. Drawing on Maitland’s (2017) model of cultural translation, the analysis traces Freitas’s interpretive gestures through which China’s past is made more intelligible to Portuguese readers and framed sympathetically, notably through familiar reference frames and recurrent images of the Chinese as “pacifist” and “traditionalist.” The case suggests that double foreignness can be productively analyzed through the interplay of intertemporal, interlingual, and cultural translation.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
History as translation Double foreignness Cultural translation Rewriting Popular history Chinese history in Portugal
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Editora
University of Porto Faculty of Arts and Humanities
Licença CC
Sem licença CC
