Repository logo
 
Publication

Erratum: Bioactive extracts from brewer's spent grain (Food and Function (2020) 11 (8963–8977) DOI: 10.1039/D0FO01426E)

2021-11-18Journal article Open access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBonifácio-Lopes, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorVilas Boas, Ana A.
dc.contributor.authorCoscueta, Ezequiel R
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Eduardo M.
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Sara
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Débora
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, José A.
dc.contributor.authorPintado, Manuela
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-22T11:10:06Z
dc.date.available2021-11-22T11:10:06Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-18
dc.description.abstractThe authors regret that an incorrect version of Table 2 was included in the original article. The correct version of Table 2 is presented below. (Figure Presented).“Consequently, sections of the text in the manuscript should be adjusted according to this change, and these are detailed below. The paragraph on page 8968 beginning “As it can be seen in Table 2…” should be correctly given as follows: “As it can be seen in Table 2, the content of total phenolics (TPC) varied from 1.83 mg gallic acid per g BSG, when ethanol was used, to 13.26 mg gallic acid per g BSG for the 60% ethanol : water extract, which represents a 0.9 fold increase in the extraction yield. It is worth highlighting that the highest amount of TPC obtained in the present work (13.26 mg gallic acid per g BSG) was higher than the values previously reported by McCarthy et al.41 (1.26–4.53 mg gallic acid per g BSG) by alkaline hydrolysis. It is also possible to see that the extraction with 60% ethanol : water was more efficient than the one performed with 100% ethanol. According to Spigno et al.42 the addition of water to organic solvents leads to the increase of the polarity of medium, which facilitates phenolic compound extraction. The results obtained in the present work (Table 2) also showed that the extraction using only water was not as efficient as when using ethanolic mixtures as solvents, since phenolic compounds have higher affinity for less polar medium, such as ethanol.43” The sentence beginning “ This value is much lower compared...” should be correctly given as “This value is much lower compared to that for the 60% ethanolic extract, since it showed ca.7 times less activity in the case of the ABTS method and ca. 10 times less than in the case of the ORAC method.” The sentence beginning “The highest values of ABTS…” should be correctly given as “The highest values of ABTS assay were obtained with 60% ethanolic extract, which was 5 times higher than the water extract and very close to the 80% ethanolic extract.”” The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1039/d1fo90072bpt_PT
dc.identifier.eid85120554520
dc.identifier.issn2042-6496
dc.identifier.pmid34792072
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/36016
dc.identifier.wos000719926500001
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewednopt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.titleErratum: Bioactive extracts from brewer's spent grain (Food and Function (2020) 11 (8963–8977) DOI: 10.1039/D0FO01426E)pt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage12162
oaire.citation.issue23
oaire.citation.startPage12162
oaire.citation.titleFood and Functionpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume12
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
39267086.pdf
Size:
149.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

CBQF - Contribuições em Revistas Científicas / Contribution to Journals