| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Abstract(s)
INTRODUÇÃO: Os cimentos de obturação à base de silicato de cálcio têm sido
estudados como alternativa à utilização de cimentos de obturação convencionais,
uma vez que visam a indução da osteogénese, sendo uma alternativa mais
favorável para a prática clínica. Neste estudo, o objetivo principal é analisar a
evidência de forma sistemática sobre a avaliação do potencial osteogénico dos
cimentos de obturação baseados em silicato de cálcio para que estes materiais
sejam utilizados de forma mais segura nos tratamentos endodônticos na prática
clínica.
MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: A pesquisa foi realizada nas plataformas
Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science e Scopus, foram definidos termos Mesh. De
seguida, realizou-se a seleção dos artigos através de critérios de inclusão e
exclusão. Os termos MeSH foram interligados com os operadores booleanos
AND e OR.
RESULTADOS: Foram selecionados 9 artigos neste estudo de revisão
sistemática. Foram estudadas várias marcas de cimentos biocerâmicos (iRoot
SP, MTA Fillapex, BioRoot RCS, EndoSequence BCS, ProRoot ESS, Endoseal
MTA, Nishika Canal Sealer BG, Nano-ceramic Sealer, Wellroot ST) e vários
cimentos convencionais (Sealapex, Apatite Root Sealer, Pulp Canal Sealer, Roth
Sealer e AH-Plus) utilizando diferentes meios de cultura.
CONCLUSÃO: Os cimentos biocerâmicos são uma boa alternativa aos cimentos
convencionais, uma vez que apresentam melhor potencial osteogénico que os
cimentos convencionais. No entanto, é necessário confirmar estes resultados
através da realização de estudos clínicos.
INTRODUCTION: Calcium silicate-based sealers have been studied as an alternative to the use of conventional sealers because they aim to induce osteogenesis and to be a more favorable alternative for clinical practice. In this study, the main objective is to systematically analyze the evidence on the evaluation of the osteogenic potential of sealers based on calcium silicate so that we can use these materials more safely in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research was carried out on Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus platforms, Mesh terms were defined. Then, the articles were selected using inclusion and exclusion criteria. The MeSH terms were linked with the Boolean operators AND and OR. RESULTS: Nine articles were selected in this systematic review study. Several brands of bioceramic sealers (iRoot SP, MTA Fillapex, BioRoot RCS, EndoSequence BCS, ProRoot ESS, Endoseal MTA, Nishika Canal Sealer BG, Nano-ceramic Sealer, Wellroot ST) and several conventional cements (Sealapex, Apatite Root Sealer, Pulp Canal Sealer, Roth Sealer and AH-Plus) using different culture media. CONCLUSION: Bioceramic sealers are a good alternative to conventional sealers, as they have better osteogenic potential than conventional sealers. However, it is necessary to confirm these results by carrying out clinical studies.
INTRODUCTION: Calcium silicate-based sealers have been studied as an alternative to the use of conventional sealers because they aim to induce osteogenesis and to be a more favorable alternative for clinical practice. In this study, the main objective is to systematically analyze the evidence on the evaluation of the osteogenic potential of sealers based on calcium silicate so that we can use these materials more safely in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research was carried out on Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus platforms, Mesh terms were defined. Then, the articles were selected using inclusion and exclusion criteria. The MeSH terms were linked with the Boolean operators AND and OR. RESULTS: Nine articles were selected in this systematic review study. Several brands of bioceramic sealers (iRoot SP, MTA Fillapex, BioRoot RCS, EndoSequence BCS, ProRoot ESS, Endoseal MTA, Nishika Canal Sealer BG, Nano-ceramic Sealer, Wellroot ST) and several conventional cements (Sealapex, Apatite Root Sealer, Pulp Canal Sealer, Roth Sealer and AH-Plus) using different culture media. CONCLUSION: Bioceramic sealers are a good alternative to conventional sealers, as they have better osteogenic potential than conventional sealers. However, it is necessary to confirm these results by carrying out clinical studies.
Description
Keywords
Cimentos biocerâmicos Formação de osso Expressão génica Bioceramic sealers Bone formation Gene expression