Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Influence and comparison of thermal, ultrasonic and thermosonic treatments on physicochemical quality of orange juice

dc.contributor.authorAmir-Tahi, Akila
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Fátima A.
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Cristina L. M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-13T11:04:57Z
dc.date.available2022-05-13T11:04:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractOrange juice is the most popular and consumed juice worldwide, associated with healthy eating habits. Thermal pasteurization treatments are used to preserve industrially produced juice. Unfortunately, this process removes many nutritious compounds. Therefore, other milder treatments are being studied to minimize the impact on the product's final quality. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of thermosonication (TS) treatment on the quality of orange juice in comparison with heat (HT) and ultrasound (UT) treatments alone. Commercial pasteurized orange juice was treated by UT, HT or TS in a sonoreactor (20 kHz and 80% amplitude) at different temperatures 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 °C for 90, 60, 60, 30 and 30 min, respectively. These treatment times were chosen to guarantee the Staphylococcus aureus inactivation. Physicochemical characteristics, such as pH, colour and Brix, and microbial cell counts, were evaluated before and after treatments. Principal components analysis (PCA) was carried out to detect simple patterns and differences.All treatments could reduce the S. aureus presence in at least 3 log cycles, except the HT at 20, 30 and 40 °C, where an increase in microbial counts was attained. The majority of quality characteristics were not significantly affected by the applied treatments, except a* value for US 20, 30 40 and 50°C, Brix for TS 60°C and pH for US 30 and 40 °C, TS 50°C and HT 20 and 50 °C. PCA revealed two components with eigenvalues greater than one, which explained 56.1% and 28.4% of the total variance, respectively. The first component was mostly influenced by a*, pH, L*, b* and Chroma, while the second by Hue and microbial inactivation. The second component allowed a clear distinction between types of treatment, while the first component allowed separation among the processing conditions of temperature/time.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/37542
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewednopt_PT
dc.subjectThermosonicationpt_PT
dc.subjectUltrasoundpt_PT
dc.subjectStaphylococcus aureuspt_PT
dc.subjectPCApt_PT
dc.titleInfluence and comparison of thermal, ultrasonic and thermosonic treatments on physicochemical quality of orange juicept_PT
dc.typeconference object
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceSwitzerlandpt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage2pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.title35th EFFoST International Conference 2021 : Healthy Individuals, Resilient Communities, and Global Food Security 1/11/21 → 4/11/21pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typeconferenceObjectpt_PT

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
Abstract_Effost_Final.pdf
Tamanho:
64.83 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format