Repository logo
 
Publication

Development of a chicken gastrointestinal tract (GIT) simulation model: impact of cecal inoculum storage preservation conditions

dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Nelson Mota de
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Célia Maria
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Cláudia
dc.contributor.authorSaleh, Mayra Anton Dib
dc.contributor.authorPintado, Manuela Estevez
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Diana Luazi
dc.contributor.authorMadureira, Ana Raquel
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-20T16:50:55Z
dc.date.available2024-03-20T16:50:55Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-22
dc.description.abstractA chicken gastrointestinal tract (GIT) simulation model was developed to help predict the potential effects of feed additives supplementation on chicken’ microbiota. The chemical and enzymatic conditions for oral, gastric, intestinal, and cecum fermentation phases were designed to closely resemble the chicken GIT conditions. For cecum fermentation, the inoculum was obtained from the cecal contents of 18 38-day broiler chickens. The impact of inoculum preservation on bacteria viability was assessed by comparing two methods of preservation with fresh inoculum: (1) 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at −80 °C and (2) 30% glycerol at −20 °C. The fermentation with fresh and frozen (DMSO method) inoculums was performed and compared using standard chicken feed (SCF) and SCF with 1% fructooligosaccharides (FOS), and inoculum control (IC) condition without feed matrix was used as a baseline. Inoculum’s viability was assessed throughout 90 days of storage by culture media platting, while bacterial growth and metabolites production during fermentation was evaluated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and total ammonia nitrogen quantification. The DMSO method was shown to be the most suitable for cecal inoculum storage. Higher growth of beneficial cecal bacteria for fresh inoculum was observed in SCF while for frozen inoculum, was the SCF + FOS condition. Also, frozen inoculum had lower activity of butyrate producers and proteolytic bacteria, showing different fermentation profiles. The GIT model developed showed to be useful to test the effect of feed additives supplementation.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/applmicrobiol3030066pt_PT
dc.identifier.eid85188835206
dc.identifier.issn0099-2240
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/44371
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectChickenpt_PT
dc.subjectIn vitro modelpt_PT
dc.subjectGastrointestinal tractpt_PT
dc.subjectPreservationpt_PT
dc.subjectViabilitypt_PT
dc.subjectFermentationpt_PT
dc.subjectCecal microbiotapt_PT
dc.subjectOrganic acidspt_PT
dc.subjectAmmoniapt_PT
dc.titleDevelopment of a chicken gastrointestinal tract (GIT) simulation model: impact of cecal inoculum storage preservation conditionspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage992pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue3pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage968pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleApplied microbiologypt_PT
oaire.citation.volume3pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
90068255.pdf
Size:
3.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: