Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

The role of biotics as a therapeutic strategy for oral mucositis - a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorFrey-Furtado, Leonor
dc.contributor.authorMagalhães, Inês
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Maria João
dc.contributor.authorSampaio-Maia, Benedita
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-26T16:32:55Z
dc.date.available2023-07-26T16:32:55Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Oral mucositis (OM) is an acute and highly prevalent side effect of cancer treatments. Currently, there is no effective strategy for its prevention or treatment. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of biotics used as a therapeutic strategy for the management of OM. Materials and Methods: The PRISMA checklist was followed and PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were screened for clinical and pre-clinical studies assessing the potential effects of biotics in OM. Inclusion criteria included in vivo studies related to oral mucositis evaluating the effect of biotics, and written in Portuguese, English, French, Spanish, or Dutch. The following exclusion criteria were used: systematic reviews and meta-analyses, reviews, case reports, opinion papers or comments, conference papers, letters without results, articles not related to oral therapy-induced mucositis or biotics, or in vitro articles that do not simulate oral mucositis. Results: From a total of 1250 articles retrieved, 9 were included in this systematic review. Four clinical studies reported a reduction in oral mucositis occurrence with Lactobacillus species (Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus brevis CD2) and Bacillus clausii UBBC07. In pre-clinical studies, Lactococcus lactis genetically modified and Lactobacillus reuteri reduced the severity of OM and Streptococcus salivarius K12 also decreased the size of the ulcers. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review suggest that probiotic supplementation may potentially reduce the incidence of therapy-induced OM and decrease its severity in patients undergoing cancer treatment. However, the available evidence is marred by significant heterogeneity across studies.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12602-023-10116-zpt_PT
dc.identifier.eid85163744099
dc.identifier.issn1867-1306
dc.identifier.pmid37389790
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/41943
dc.identifier.wos001020407900002
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectHead and neck cancerpt_PT
dc.subjectOral cancerpt_PT
dc.subjectOral mucositispt_PT
dc.subjectPrebioticspt_PT
dc.subjectProbioticspt_PT
dc.titleThe role of biotics as a therapeutic strategy for oral mucositis - a systematic reviewpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1326
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage1313
oaire.citation.titleProbiotics and Antimicrobial Proteinspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume16
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Ficheiros