Repository logo
 
Publication

Clinical performance comparing titanium and titanium–zirconium or zirconia dental implants

2022Journal article Open access
Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Paulo Rafael Esteves
dc.contributor.authorOtero, Ada Isis Pelaez
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Juliana Campos Hasse
dc.contributor.authorNassani, Leonardo Mohamad
dc.contributor.authorCastilho, Rogerio Moraes
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-03T12:53:37Z
dc.date.available2022-06-03T12:53:37Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to compare clinical results between titanium (Ti), zirconia (Zr), or titanium–zirconium (TZ) dental implants and to analyze survival rate (SR), bleeding on probing (BoP), marginal bone loss (MBL), and/or probing depth (PD). Data source: Manual and electronic searches were conducted (PubMed and Web of Science) to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the outcomes of at least two implant types (control and test group) within the same study. The focused question was determined according to the PICOT strategy. Seven studies were included out of 202 research studies initially found. The follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 80 months, and the mean age was from 43.3 to 65.8 years old. The SR for Ti, TZ, and Zr implants ranged from 92.6% to 100%, 95.8% to 100%, and 87.5% to 91.25%, respectively; MBL for Ti, TZ, and Zr implants varied from −1.17 mm to −0.125 mm for Ti, −0.6 mm to −0.32 mm for TZ, and −0.25 mm to −1.38 mm for Zr. Studies showed a low incidence of mucositis and peri-implantitis; however, BoP for Zr was 16.43%, Ti ranged between 10% and 20%, and TZ from 10% to 13.8%. PD for Ti ranged from 1.6 mm to 3.05 mm, TZ was 3.12 mm (only one study), and Zr ranged from 2.21 mm to 2.6 mm. Conclusion: All three types of implants showed similar tissue behavior. However, the TZ group had better results when compared with Ti and Zr for SR, MBL, and BoP, except for PD. Furthermore, the worst SR was found in the Zr implants group.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/dj10050083pt_PT
dc.identifier.eid85130349494
dc.identifier.issn2304-6767
dc.identifier.pmcPMC9140125
dc.identifier.pmid35621536
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/37819
dc.identifier.wos000801383900001
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectClinical studiespt_PT
dc.subjectDental implantspt_PT
dc.subjectSystematic reviewpt_PT
dc.subjectTitaniumpt_PT
dc.subjectZirconiapt_PT
dc.titleClinical performance comparing titanium and titanium–zirconium or zirconia dental implantspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue5pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleDentistry Journalpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume10pt_PT
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
44054942.pdf
Size:
1.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

CIIS - Contribuições em Revistas Científicas / Contribution to Journals