Machery, EdouardStich, StephenRose, DavidAlai, MarioAngelucci, AdrianoBerniūnas, RenatasBuchtel, Emma E.Chatterjee, AmitaCheon, HyundeukCho, In RaeCohnitz, DanielCova, FlorianDranseika, ViliusLagos, Ángeles ErañaGhadakpour, LalehGrinberg, MauriceHannikainen, IvarHashimoto, TakaakiHorowitz, AmirHristova, EvgeniyaJraissati, YasminaKadreva, VeselinaKarasawa, KaoriKim, HackjinKim, YeonjeongLee, MinwooMauro, CarlosMizumoto, MasaharuMoruzzi, SebastianoOlivola, Christopher Y.Ornelas, JorgeOsimani, BarbaraRomero, CarlosLopez, Alejandro RosasSangoi, MassimoSereni, AndreaSonghorian, SarahSousa, PauloStruchiner, NoelTripodi, VeraUsui, NaokiMercado, Alejandro Vázquez delVolpe, GiorgioVosgerichian, Hrag AbrahamZhang, XueyiZhu, Jing2021-06-082021-06-082017-09-010970-7794http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/33513This article examines whether people share the Gettier intuition (viz. that someone who has a true justified belief that p may nonetheless fail to know that p) in 24 sites, located in 23 countries (counting Hong Kong as a distinct country) and across 17 languages. We also consider the possible influence of gender and personality on this intuition with a very large sample size. Finally, we examine whether the Gettier intuition varies across people as a function of their disposition to engage in “reflective” thinking.engCore epistemologyGender and cultural differencesGettier intuitionKnowledge ascriptionPersonalityReflection defenseUniversaljournal article10.1007/s40961-017-0113-y85045934513000416767800006